Free Web Site - Free Web Space and Site Hosting - Web Hosting - Internet Store and Ecommerce Solution Provider - High Speed Internet
Search the Web
Give Me Liberty, Or Give Me Death! Giveliberty.com Givemeliberty.50megs.com America is at a crisis point; a choice between liberty or slavery! Conspiracy, the New World Order, the Illuminati, the Skull and Bones, the Federal Reserve, central banking, police state, martial law, treason, etc. Patrick Henry and the Anti-Federalists warned us about those that saught to take over this country.

small logo

"The question before the House is one of awful moment to this country. For my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the debate. It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country. Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings."-- Patrick Henry

"If this be treason, make the most of it!"

"Government is not reason; it is not eloquence; it is force! Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master."  (George Washington)

Note: there are those that dismiss everything that isn't told them by their government-run schools and media outlets as "conspiracy theory". By all means, you should go back to your sociology teacher and allow him/her to brainwash you into thinking that the government never colludes against the people, and that the powerful are always honest. I guess that all of this talk about the Nazis killing civilians is nothing but a bunch of conspiracy talk, eh? After all, there's no such thing as a conspiracy... Right? If you believe that, then I've got some oceanfront property in Arizona to sell you. I don't like the word "conspiracy" for its negative connotation, given that it has been bandied about by Hollywood and its brainwashed audience for far too long. I prefer the terms "corroborated history", for you will find plenty of corroborative evidence on this web site and its many links. You will find quotes from the powerful and the wealthy (those that are in the know) throughout this page, and in the Relevant and Famous Quotes section of this web site.

From a historical perspective, the only reality is that of conspiracy. The very nature of warfare, corporate business, and government is conspiratorial. Nations seek to outwit and destroy their opponents by any means, including psychological warfare, not only waged against the enemy, but also against an unwilling public. Propaganda has always been a staple of government, and the Nazis certainly didn’t invent it, nor did it die with their German faction. What is truly amazing is that we still fall for the propaganda games of our governments after being exposed to them for over a thousand years and reading about them in our history books. After Vietnam, Watergate, Iran Contra, the U.N. Oil for Food Program, etc., only the most delusional can deny the existence of conspiracy. By definition, secret organizations, such as the CIA, FBI, NSA, Secret Service, etc., are duplicitous and clandestine. Corporate board meetings are not usually made public knowledge, nor are the National Security meetings that the President holds with his cabinet. Secret police have always been the benchmark of totalitarian regimes, yet Americans never seem to question the fact that they are bombarded with more secret police agencies than they can count on two hands. What purpose does the secret police serve in a supposedly free society, except to oppress and destroy those freedoms? Fool the public into believing all manner of menacing hobgoblins, and the "Waffen SS" can have its way with them.

Considering that supreme power lies in knowledge, he who controls the flow of information controls all. There is only one institution among men with the resources to control what you know, think and do, and that is government and the moneyed vultures that hold its reigns. Deception is the greatest tool utilized by the wealthy and the powerful against the masses for maintaining their power, and this has been shown countless times throughout history, so it is of little wonder that the programmed “official culture” of the elites denounces all information that threatens the status quo as “conspiracy” and fringe "lunacy". But as a wise President once said: "You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time."

The psychosocial dynamic of the human being has developed denial as a defense mechanism against painful truths that are either too horrific or fantastic for it to assimilate. Under certain circumstances, human beings will deny their reality, even in the face of overwhelming evidence. Truly, we see what we want to see, and not necessarily what is actually there. For instance, how many mothers have been unwilling to admit the horrible crimes of their children, despite the evidence that is apparent? How many of your friends seem to be stuck in a Left/Right paradigm that has them voting a certain party line despite the overwhelming evidence that both sides are working for the same financiers? The more terrible or fantastic the nature of reality, the more our conscious minds deny it. Based on our limited experience, we construct our own world view paradigm, which even when clearly incorrect under the particular circumstance, is often defended beyond all reason. We must learn to think outside of our proverbial little box. We must run counter to the misinformed masses that proclaim, "If ignorance is bliss, tis' folly to be wise."

The real power behind our government wants you, as an individual, to be totally accountable to them, while being held without accountability themselves. They want to know who you are, how you get and spend your money, and they want you to believe several core concepts. These are the ones pushed down your throat every time you open a newspaper or magazine, turn on the radio or television, or watch a movie. These are the ideas and values that "they" have selected for you to believe-- and which you know deep down are lies. They are issues, beliefs, and attitudes which, if you deny them publicly, will get you in trouble. They are the lies you deny in whispers, privately, only to your close friends. These are the issues some call "politically correct." This is called propaganda folks, and it is every bit as pervasive in the Americas as it ever was in Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia. The fact that most don't realize this is proof of its effectiveness.

"I have the greatest admiration for your propaganda. Propaganda in the West is carried out by experts who have had the best training in the world-- and have mastered the techniques with exceptional proficiency ... Yours are subtle and persuasive; ours are crude and obvious ... I think that the fundamental difference between our worlds, with respect to propaganda, is quite simple. You tend to believe yours ... and we tend to disbelieve ours."-- Soviet correspondent based five years in the U.S.

" That you are a slave, Neo. Like everyone else you were born into bondage, born into a prison that you cannot smell or taste or touch. A prison for your mind.... Unfortunately, no one can be told what the Matrix is. You have to see it for yourself. This is your last chance. After this there is no turning back. You take the blue pill, the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill, you stay in Wonderland, and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes... Remember, all I'm offering is the truth, nothing more... Follow me..."-- Morpheus in The Matrix

To quote Ronald Reagan: "I am going to talk of controversial things. I make no apology for this."

The information contained on this web site is, for the most part, secret. You won't learn it in school and your government-run media outlets won't tell you about it either. It exists almost exclusively on the last free informational medium available to man, the internet (yet some illogically dismiss internet content because of its free and unfettered nature.) Our Founders were at least wise enough to not view free speech and a free press as an impediment. The truth should have nothing to hide or hide from. If you have what it takes to make it through this diatribe, then you will have the satisfaction of knowledge that one in ten thousand possesses.  What you learn here may just rock the foundations of your world view-- and as an important historical document says: "ye shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free."

Many of you will read the words below and say, "that's crazy!" But to anyone that is willing to do the necessary research, they will find the truth. Just remember, you will always have to dig for the truth. Lies will be bandied about everywhere that you look, endlessly repeated and promoted, because lies are always told for someone's self-interest and benefit. The truth stands alone, and serves to further no one's personal agenda. Liars always seek to bury the truth, which is why you will have to work much harder to find it. The truth is simply-- the truth... It doesn't need your approval or promotion, because it is prima facie (stands alone as evidence unto itself). When you see it, it will stand out, but you will likely deny it because it will not serve your personal self-interests. You will want to believe that everything is just fine and that America is still "the land of the free and the home of the brave", because that will make you feel better.

"Is life so dear or peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take, but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death!"

"WE ARE APT TO SHUT OUR EYES AGAINST A PAINFUL TRUTH...
FOR MY PART, I AM WILLING TO KNOW THE WHOLE TRUTH;
TO KNOW THE WORST; AND TO PROVIDE FOR IT."

---- Patrick Henry

Those are the brave words of my great ancestor (pictured above) before the Virginia House of Burgesses on March 23rd, 1775; words for which he could have been hanged on the spot.  I ask, where has this love of freedom and liberty gone? Too often the American people have given up the liberties supposedly guaranteed them under the Constitution, only to pass on this great debt to their children and their grandchildren.

“The Constitution is swollen with dangerous doctrine; doctrine that will be taken advantage of by the Federalists, a faction of monarchy men, military men, aristocrats and drones whose noise, impudence and zeal exceeds all belief."Richard Henry Lee, letter to George Mason, 1 October 1787

There existed a strong element within this country that maintained ties to the Crown before and after the Revolutionary War. These monarchy men, mostly known as the Federalists, worked for the Crown and sought to undermine the fledgling Republic from its beginning. The Anti-Federalists (Patrick Henry was a prominent one of these) sounded the warning about the dubious actions of the Federalists; their public debates centered on the centralization of government under a Federal Constitution, the powers of the Executive branch in a consolidated and Federally Constituted government, and later, upon monetary issues. Of course, the Federalists were for a Federal consolidated government, a national central bank, and a strong Presidential office.

Though the Anti-Federalists are generally ignored by our history books, it is because of them that we have a Bill of Rights. A huge victory for freedom lovers at the time, but this victory would not last for long, as you will see. Most of those who will read this web site will scarcely realize that the Bill of Rights (the very linchpin of individual liberty in the Constitution) did not emanate from the Framers of this document, but from the powerful dissent led by Patrick Henry and others that nearly torpedoed this radical measure. Using the same political trickery that modern politicos use today, the Framers of the Constitution added the Bill of Rights as a small concession to its dissenters in order to get it passed by the States.

Patrick Henry was asked by his home State of Virginia to represent them at the Constitutional Convention of 1787. He refused this service stating, "I smell a rat!"

"Unlike Henry, we have bought the lie that government made us rich, and that government can keep us that way. We have accepted the farce that an armed and independent people means nothing in the face of great dangers in far away lands. Indeed, these are the same lies spouted in Henry’s time. As Patrick Henry knew, Federalists, the ideological great-grandfathers of our own tax-happy centralizers, built everything on fear. Fear of economic decay, fear of foreign enemies, and fear of disunity. For a civilized and free people, the answers to such fears could no more be found in the hands of government in 1788 as today. Indeed, for Henry, it is those hands that are the only true threat to liberty." ~ Ryan McMaken

You may be very surprised at what you were never taught at government school. For instance, the Avalon Project at Yale Law School has documented significant sections of American history, through the various contracts and treaties that we have signed with foreign governments. I suggest that you check some of this material out at their web site linked above, because I believe what you learn will be quite shocking.

"It having pleased the Divine Providence to dispose the hearts of the most serene and most potent Prince George the Third, by the grace of God, king of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, defender of the faith, duke of Brunswick and Luxembourg, arch-treasurer and prince elector of the Holy Roman Empire etc.,"-- Treaty of Paris (1783)

For instance, I would wager that you did not know that the colonies were borrowing money from King George III, through France (King George was the King of France, see Treaty of Peace 1783) before, during, and after the Revolutionary War (1775-1783) to the tune of 18 million of liveres, as indicated by the Contract of 1782. What is the King of England (France) doing financing both sides of this war!? Also, according to the Treaty of Paris (the treaty that ended the war), article IV; all debts were to be repaid to their creditors (King) and article V, which returned all confiscated land to real British subjects. This treaty also provided for the use of the Mississippi River by England. Kind of a one sided treaty, huh? Note that the American signers of this treaty carried the title "Esqr." (Esquire a.k.a. attorney, lawyer), which legally denotes them as officers of the King's courts, thus making both parties the same party and thus only one creditor and recipient of confiscated lands (the Crown). When you only have one party to a contract, its not really a contract. Also, according to the Treaty of Amity, Commerce, and Navigation (1794), the King kept troops quartered in the U.S. well after the war. It would seem that the Revolutionary War was nothing but a ruse with the goal of placing the American colonies in considerable debt to the Crown. It is the exact same premise used by credit card companies that make considerable profits off of debt slavery. Control the monetary policies of a country, and you control that country. Like all wars over the past four hundred years, the Revolutionary War was fought for monetary reasons.

Jonathan Williams recorded in his book, Legions of Satan, 1781, that Cornwallis revealed to Washington during his surrender that "a holy war will now begin on America, and when it is ended America will be supposedly the citadel of freedom, but her millions will unknowingly be loyal subjects to the Crown."...."in less than two hundred years the whole nation will be working for divine world government.  That government that they believe to be divine will be the British Empire." 

Ask yourself these questions: why would the King be ceding land and other rights to the colonists in the Treaty of Paris, if they had won the war? Shouldn't they be negotiating the terms of the King's surrender, and not begging for fishing rights from the King? Was the Declaration of Independence null and void? When someone wins a war, do they negotiate the terms of their victory? Why would the King secure the debts owed to all creditors, unless he had a personal stake in it? Why would we give back nearly everything gained in the Treaty of Peace in the 1794 Jay Treaty? Did Douglas MacArthur allow the emperor of Japan to negotiate his surrender? The fact of the matter is that the Treaty of Paris was a farce. Obviously, had we won the war, signing such a Treaty would be unnecessary. We would be dictating to him (the loser) what he could and could not do. Clearly, the King retained his authority under the Treaty of Paris, especially when he refers to himself as the King of the "United States of America". When someone grants you something, then that something is a privilege and you are a subject. Also, notice that the King did not cede his mineral rights granted him under the original corporate charters of the States.

1. All debts contracted and engagements entered into, before the adoption of this constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this constitution, as under the confederation.

2. This constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, any thing in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding. __ Article Six, Section One of the U.S. Constitution

It is interesting to note that the due date on the loans discussed under the Contract of 1782 was January 1, 1788. Was the scramble for a Constitutional Convention in 1787 an attempt at reorganization for bankruptcy? Note that Article Six, Section One keeps the loans from the King current. It states; "All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation." It would appear that the Constitution was a contract securing the King's ransom and providing for control of his debtors (note that the Crown of England was sworn in fealty to the Pope under the Charter of 1213, making the "Crown" the legal arm of the Vatican when this charter was breeched by the Magna Carta of 1215).

It would appear that the creditors ("Arch-Treasurer and Prince Elector of the Holy Roman Empire and of the United States of America," i.e., King George III, according to the Paris Peace Treaty of 1783) of the newly reorganized "United States" wanted the interest on the loans that they had given the colonists (Contract of 1782), so Alexander Hamilton (Federalist extraordinaire) came up with an ingenious plan for taxing alcohol. The people resisted and George Washington sent the militia out to collect this tax, an event known by historians as the Whiskey Rebellion. And collect this tax he did.

According to Article One, Clause 15, the militia is responsible for executing the laws of the land. Also, notice Clause 16, which states that it is Congress that has the power to arm and organize the militia. Make no bones about it folks! The militia (police, IRS, etc.) are not here for our protection. The Constitution never provided for our protection, but for the collection of our substance and the maintenance of plantation America for her creditors.

After the Civil War Congress was proclaimed "sine die" and effectively abolished by Abraham Lincoln, a new contract was made between the subjects (citizens) of the United States as contracted with the District of Columbia called the 14th Amendment. Along with establishing the "constructive trust" (a legal device used to enslave others by granting them certain privileges, that when accepted, binds them in other, usually secret, ways) that the subjects were hereby held accountable to. It provided this little gem for the debt slaves contracted to the corporation of the District of Columbia:

Section 4: The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned…

14th Amendment

One only has to look at the actions of a certain "Esqr." Alexander Hamilton in the creation of the United States (central) Bank of 1791, in order to witness the fruit born of the Federalists. This, of course, was a private bank, of which 18,000 of the 25,000 shares were owned by England. This bank led to so much economic turmoil and rampant corruption that its charter was not renewed in 1811, leading to the War of 1812. Soon, the second BUS was chartered just after the war, until it was put down by Andrew Jackson, who exclaimed: "You are a den of vipers and thieves. I intend to rout you out, by the Eternal God, I will rout you out!" In 1913, England cemented its control over our monetary system with the creation of the Federal Reserve System, culminating in the second reorganization for bankruptcy under FDR.

"Esquires by virtue of their offices; as justices of the peace, and others who bear any office of trust under the crown....for whosoever studieth the laws of the realm, who studieth in the universities, who professeth the liberal sciences, and who can live idly, and without manual labor, and will bear the port, charge, and countenance of a gentleman, he shall be called master, and shall be taken for a gentleman." Blackstone Commentaries p.561-562.

To live idly: Interesting notion, don't you think? How true it is... Parasites sanctioned by the Crown. Today in the U.S., there are more police, policing organizations, lawyers, prisons, and prison populations in ratio to common citizens, than any nation on earth. We live in a police state, and we have no clue. These agents of tyranny owe no allegiance to the people of this country, but are sworn to the Crown, operating out of the District of Columbia. They are put here to bust and prosecute Code breakers (the enemies of the Crown), as acknowledged by our courts, and not for your benefit. So, am I saying that most cops, lawyers,and judges know exactly what is going on, and are willingly selling the common man down the creek? Not at all... Most are just like you, fooled and conned into contracting with an entity that they do not understand. Most, especially today, have been sufficiently brainwashed by the media propaganda machine into believing that they are working for their country, when in reality they are merely agents for the thugs that rule from the District of Columbia. But some of them know full well what is going on, and for their own benefit they go along.

The fact of the matter is that the King of England allowed the colonists of America to falsely believe that they were free, just as he did with the British people under the Magna Carta of 1215 and the Declaration of Rights of 1689. It's the same old game, but we are too ignorant about our history to figure it out.

What did the Revolutionary War do? It granted us more revocable privileges from the King (certain land rights,etc.,) while still leaving us subjects of the King. This was the Kings plan all along, and he stated it in public. The same old game was played during reconstruction after the Civil War; the antiquated chattel system of slavery was replaced with debt slavery through equity chancery contracts (14th Amendment). Subjugation of the colonies through military might became too costly and inefficient, and so the old Babylonian/Roman system of managing the conquered was fully enacted in secret. Let the colonists think that they are free, and they will work harder and complain less, while filling the Crown coffers. And so it was that the King went about filling the colonies with his agents sworn to his service (esquires a.k.a. lawyers.) In Henry's day, his greatest enemies were the loyalist Tories, most of whom had connections to the British Aristocracy. They were agents of the Crown (esquires, Federalists, etc,) and everyone knew it; a few stood against them; too few.

Today, things are really no different than what they were in the middle ages. Modern serfs are driving BMW's and living in lavish dwellings that they are paying the Crown bank for, but they are all still just serfs. None of us hold allodial title to the land (property taxes,) or really own the things that we buy with our credit cards or credit money. And when our Lords see a money making opportunity in foreign lands, they take our well-earned credit money and our children to go fight for it. We are, after all, still expected to give our lives and our service to our Lords in the District of Columbia. We are told that we are rich and free, but debt slavery and government-sponsored terrorism in the form of the IRS, CIA, FBI, and Al Qaida can hardly be called legitimate choices, freedom, or wealth.

For over 150 years, "Bonesmen" have run the world from positions in banking, intelligence, media, law and government. Members included Presidential handler Averell Harriman, anti war leader William Sloan Coffin, Time-Life magnate Henry Luce, Truman war secretary Henry Stimson (responsible for dropping the atomic bomb), pseudo conservative William F. Buckley and many more. -Henry Makow PH.D.

We are still serfs under the feudal system established by the King. It is a myth that the Revolution was a commoners movement. It was, in fact, conceived and led by the Aristocratic class of America that had been long established by the Crown, through the Crown Templar Bar. The Crown (the financial agents of the Vatican) have established their regional governors in order to properly control the serfs. Like the days of Braveheart (William Wallace,) the Nobles are the key to controlling the slaves. The Revolution did not change this fact. It just allowed it to operate sub rosa. The American Aristocracy (the Eastern moneyed class with ties to the European upper class and royalty) are still pulling our strings. We learned in the last election that Bush and Kerry were, in fact, cousins with family ties to European Royalty. This is nothing new. It's been going on for hundreds of years. Franklin Delano Roosevelt (the 32nd president) was a fifth cousin of Theodore Roosevelt (the 26th President). Genealogists have determined that FDR was related to a total of 11 U.S. presidents, 5 by blood and 6 by marriage: John Adams, John Quincy Adams, Ulysses Grant, William Henry Harrison, Benjamin Harrison, James Madison, Theodore Roosevelt, William Taft, Zachary Taylor, Martin Van Buren, and George Washington. The intelligence community, banking, Wall Street, etc, are all connected to these same bloodlines and European Aristocracy. Comb the names of the board of directors of every major company, and you will find a who's who list of the American Aristocracy. These are the same names that grace every Presidential administration and our so-called military-industrial complex. They are names like Morgan, DuPont, Roosevelt, Rockefeller, Rothschild, Chase, etc.

"George Herbert Walker Bush has three lines that go back to King Edward I of England. He also is descended from King Henry I and King Henry II, both of England, and William I and Robert II, both of Scotland. Bush has common ancestors with 15 American presidents: Washington, Fillmore, Pierce, Lincoln, Grant, Hayes, Garfield, Cleveland, both Roosevelts, Taft, Coolidge, Hoover, Nixon and Ford.

Other presidents who have connections to British royalty are George Washington, the two Adamses, Millard Fillmore, Rutherford Hayes, Grover Cleveland, Theodore Roosevelt, William Taft, Woodrow Wilson, Calvin Coolidge, Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan. "

Things got so bad with so-called "Esquires" and "Attorneys" (agents of the Crown) running the country that a new amendment was suggested to the Constitution. In 1810, the original Thirteenth Amendment was proposed, which would have effectively removed the king’s power of reclaiming his land from the American people, by removing the possibility of lawyers/esquires running and obtaining office in the United States government. Strangely, this Amendment, though ratified by most of the States before 1812 and finally by Virginia in 1819, seems to have disappeared until fifty years later when it was replaced by what we currently call the Thirteenth Amendment, which has nothing to do with the original. How could such a fraud be perpetrated upon our history books? Well, the evidence is overwhelming that such an Amendment did exist and was ratified long before the Civil War and can be seen in many of the official documents from the era. If you don't believe me, then here is just one: Journal of the Senate (1810). Here are a bunch more. Also, it is interesting that the financial records of the nation and the documentation concerning the ratification of the original 13th Amendment were burned by the British during the War of 1812. It appears they didn't fully cover their tracks, for official copies of the Constitution with the original 13th Amendment continued to be leaked out by States whose official records weren't burned by the British, and these copies don't show the anti-slavery Amendment, which wasn't ratified till after the Civil War.

Also, as evidence of the new Thirteenth Amendments impending passage; on December 2, 1817 John Quincy Adams, then Secretary of State, wrote to Buck (an attorney) regarding the position Buck had been assigned.  The letter reads:

"...if it should be the opinion of this Government that the acceptance on your part of the Commission under which it was granted did not interfere with your citizenship.      It is the opinion of the Executive that under the 13th amendment to the constitution by the acceptance of such an appointment from any foreign Government, a citizen of the United States ceases to enjoy that character, and becomes incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under the United States or either of them...     J.Q.A.

"If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them."-- Original 13th Amendment ratified in 1819. [Journal of the Senate]

You see, Attorneys (Attornies), Lawyers, Esquires swore an oath to the "Crown Templar Bar", i.e., they are the legal arm of the King and the Vatican. It is the equivalent of today's American Bar Association, which is a franchise of the Lawyer's Guild of Great Britain. Not much has changed today, where these franchised members of elite clubs with their secret oaths, are placed in control of nearly every office in the land, and hold a total monopoly on the legal system of this country.

"Not only the financial power, but also the legal power, has remained seated in Britain. The Washington Post commented on June 18, 1983 that after the American Revolution, all the old laws remained in effect in the new United States: Some of these laws of "English common law" dated back to 1278, long before America was discovered."-- Eustace Mullins

As you are coming to learn, the U.S., and the entire world for that matter, is still under Roman Law, which is Babylonian Talmudic Law, Justinian Codes and Hammurabi's Code, known today in the U.S. as the Uniform Commercial Code. We are members of the ardu (slave) class, i.e., tenants, "subjects", or "citizens" (notice that the use of the word "citizen" changed under the 14th Amendment, the Amendment that placed us all under the Code by granting us privileges from a contracting party instead of Rights derived of God) of Rome. This whole system of charters, contracts, deeds, conveyances, bonds, feuds and corporations is Babylonian Code, which is essentially a secret law administered within conquered nations for the benefit of the conquering force that allows them to extract tribute. Just take a look at the words used in the contracts and charters that are mentioned above and then notice their definitions. It is an ingenious system of thievery by equity (chancery) contracts. It was used extensively by the Roman Empire for controlling her conquered subjects, and has been the supreme law of the land (not the Constitutional Bill of Rights) since the Civil War under Abraham Lincoln, who abolished Congress as a lawful Constitutional entity and established Martial (Justinian Code) Law. Today, Congress as well as our Judicial branch operate under the auspices of the Executive branch. This is why the flag of the Executive branch flies in our Courts of law (gold fringed flag.) Our Government as it is portrayed today, is nothing more than a hoax. We are taxed without representation, and subject to military subjugation.

First, there is novation, [taken from Roman Justinian Code] from the Latin, novatio. This concept did not exist in American law before Lincoln's War Against the States. Novation is the extinguishment of a prior debt by a new debt obligation. Today, this is done by a birth certificate when a baby's foot is placed thereon - before it touches the land. The certificate is then recorded at a County Recorder, sent to the Secretary of State in the State where the baby is born, exported to the Department of Commerce, and Bureau of Census and the process of converting a man's life , labor, and property to an asset of the United States government is in place. (Ever wonder how the government can be so deeply in debt and still remain solvent? You're the collateral!) Novation is not complete until the child -- as adult -- voluntarily assents to being a debtor, by submitting an application for a benefit, privilege, immunity, or opportunity from any branch of martial law agency. It does not matter whether it's The Department of Motor Vehicles or, The Social Security Administration, the effect is the same. Novation converts a baby's life, liberty, labor, and property, to an asset of the United States, a Federal Corporation, and converts flesh and blood man or woman, created under substantive Law by God, to a persona, {15} i.e., a fiction. One is now living collateral for the debts of the United States corporation, who has entered into commerce for some benefit, privilege, etc., from an imperial power, regulated by military law that benefits bondholders of the debt of the corporation.-- Alan Russel

There are some whom will undoubtedly ask why Lincoln did not import the civil law of Rome. The answer is, the idea of Roman civil (British Common) law is bogus because Rome was always under the god Mars, i.e., Martial law (Temple) and was always a military state in which the Roman Legions were used to expand and maintain control of Rome's insatiable commercial appetite on behalf of the Crown Temple God (Emperor, Mars,etc.). Haven't you ever wondered why you need a lawyer in order to have justice? Why can't the law be made accessible and understandable to the common man? This is because we live under Roman Justinian Code, a legal system that is often kept a secret from the public. We all have selected sections of the Constitution of the U.S. drilled into our skulls from the time we start Government school, but we never learn about the commercial Codes that actually rule and control our lives. These codes are in the Roman/Babylonian tradition that brought large sections of the world under Roman rule.

"Britain was first invaded in 55 BC. by Julius Caesar, then again in 54 BC. In 63 AD. Joseph of Arimathea was sent by the Pope in Rome to try and establish the Catholic Church in Britain. In 77 AD. Britain was taken over through conquest by Rome. The Imperial governor Julius Agricola was put in place to rule over Rome’s new territory. Britain was as of 77 AD. subject to Rome, with Roman law."[6]

See definitions of Esquire and Attorney.

"(See the British army in the building of the British merchant Empire and the accumulation of the vast wealth of the Rothschilds/Rhodes and the like. It is very instructive to talk to UNITED STATES soldiers today, and hear how they cannot get an education any other way or, in many cases, earn a living outside of the military forces. This is identical to the situation which existed in England for centuries, and the world is littered with the graves of the common folk of England who died to 'create' the merchant Empire of "The City", and who never saw any gain for their deaths. Also see the book The Empire of "The City" by E. C. Knuth, where you will learn that the real power of the British "Empire" is the London financial district known as "The City", and "the Crown" is the committee of 12 to 14 men who rule "The City", thus being the "power" behind the "King".)" See source Here

On January 24, 1791, it was announced by George Washington the creation of the District of Columbia as the seat of the new government. This district, consisting of 10 square miles within the state of Virginia, was incorporated after the Civil War in 1871. Just like any other corporation, its operation is for that of profit. As most of you have learned in school, this district is it's own little country unto itself:

The Constitution of the United States of America, Article I, Section 8, Clause 17:

       To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;

Like "The City" is to London, the District of Columbia is the secret conclave that rules Amerika under the law merchant. The corporate district that houses the seat of our government and carries on the Roman commercial tradition, which makes our laws compatible with the Crown, while keeping the obligations and charters between the Crown and her incorporated District States valid.

What do you mean "District States"? In 1791, George Washington didn't just establish the District of Columbia, but he divided the United States into District States under the power of the President, as authorized by the newly formed District of Columbia, through the new powers given Congress as the "exclusive Legislators" of that District by the Constitution.

"In reading the Messages and Papers of the Presidents, vol. I, 1789-1897, I discovered the following:

Gentlemen of the Senate:

Pursuant to the powers vested in me by the act entitled "An act repealing after the last day of June next the duties heretofore laid upon distilled spirits imported from abroad and laying others in their stead, and also upon spirits distilled within the United States, and for appropriating the same," I have thought fit to divide the United States into the following districts, namely:

The district of New Hampshire, to consist of the State of New Hampshire; the district of Massachusetts, to consist of the State of Massachusetts; the district of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, to consist of the State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations; the district of Connecticut, to consist of the State of Connecticut; the district of Vermont, to consist of the State of Vermont; the district of New York, to consist of the State of New York; the district of New Jersey, to consist of the State of New Jersey; the district of Pennsylvania, to consist of the State of Pennsylvania; the district of Delaware, to consist of the State of Delaware; the district of Maryland, to consist of the State of Maryland; the district of Virginia, to consist of the State of Virginia; the district of North Carolina, to consist of the State of North Carolina; the district of South Carolina, to consist of the State of South Carolina; and the district of Georgia, to consist of the State of Georgia." March 4, 1791 (page 99).[4]

You've heard the term "District Courts". These were established by the Judiciary Act of 1789, which was necessarily passed in order to make our legal system compatible with the Roman/Babylonian system used by the Crown. Washington followed this salvo with the division of the entire country into districts to be under the authority of the District of Columbia, and not the Constitution of the United States, which effectively does nothing, except provide for the creation and authority of the corporate charters of the District of Columbia. All that is needed now is a declaration of martial law, like we had during the Civil War, and these contracts can all be called in, i.e., the privileges granted the Crown subjects can be revoked.

It is no coincidence that 1791 also saw the creation of the Bank of the U.S. (England), and a few years later the newly formed districts were called upon to use their new authority under Presidential order to call in the King's ransom (whiskey rebellion). Washington, who said that he did not want to be King, dissolved the Union of states under the Federation, and replaced it with District States under his authority, granted by the Crown (Congress) in the District of Columbia. This obviously abolished the sovereignty of the states, and created the United District States of Amerika.

The Constitution was the formative document for a new Crown colony, placed in the united States on a piece of ground ceded by Virginia. This gives the United States the same status under International Law as Canada. This was done by men who had no desire to see the "colonies" separate from Britain. Men who deeply felt the need for a "king".-- David Gould

After the Civil War, a permanent state of war was declared by the passage of the Reconstruction Acts and thus a military puppet government was established within the conquered Southern States in order to get the 14th Amendment ratified in those States. This Amendment established a dictatorship under the authority of Congress within the District of Columbia and her chartered District States, by redefining the term "Citizen" and granting conditional privileges to United States "citizens". In other words, it completely changed the Constitution. Soon, the IRS was established to extract tribute from the conquered Southern States and the first Social Security (Identification Numbers) were issued to black slaves under Martial Law, as the entire country was, in subsequent years, to be placed under the military control of the District of Columbia. The death of Lincoln paved the way for all of this. In 1933, FDR declared war against all American citizens under the Trading With The Enemies Act, effectively completing what Washington and Lincoln had begun.

"The amendment (fourteenth) reversed and annulled the original policy of the constitution," United States v. Rhodes, 27 Federal Cases, 785, 794.

Citizen: One who, under the Constitution and laws of the United States, or of a particular state, is a member of the political community, owing allegiance and being entitled to the enjoyment of full civil rights. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the state wherein they reside. U.S. Const., 14th Amend. See Citizenship.

"It is quite clear then that there is a citizenship of the United States and a citizenship of a State, which are distinct from each other and which depend upon different characteristics or circumstances in the individual." Slaughter House Cases, 83 US 395, 407.-- U.S Supreme Court

"...the first eight amendments have uniformly been held not be protected from state action by the privileges and immunities clause (of the fourteenth amendment)." Hague v. CIO, 307 US 496, 520.

"The right to trial by jury in civil cases, guaranteed by the Seventh Amendment...and the right to bear arms guaranteed by the Second Amendment...have been distinctly held not to be privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment ...and in effect the same decision was made in respect of the guarantee against prosecution, except by indictment of a grand jury, contained in the Fifth Amendment...and in respect of the right to be confronted with witnesses, contained in the Sixth Amendment... it was held that the indictment, made indispensable by the Fifth Amendment, and the trial by jury guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment, were no privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States, as those words were used in the fourteenth Amendment. We conclude, therefore, that the exemption from compulsory self-incrimination is not a privilege or immunity of National citizenship guaranteed by this clause of the Fourteenth Amendment." Twining v. New Jersey, 211 US 78, 98-99.

So, a lawyer (prosecutor) can bring charges against you for any reason, whatsoever, without need of a grand jury: there are no restrictions upon the government as regards her 14th Amendment citizens. You have no Bill of Rights under the Constitution, since 1871 and the passage of the 14th Amendment. That is, if you are a contracted "citizen" of that Government.

You see, government is an illusion made possible by you. It is a parasite that lives off of the substance of others only by their consent, whether wittingly or unwittingly. Politicians are the biggest dead beats on the planet, because they produce nothing, but extract their subsistence off of their so-called constituents. By contracting with this government entity (licenses, fees, taxes, 1040's, grants, social security, welfare, military, etc.), you are ceding your rights as a free individual to a sovereign that now has power and jurisdiction over you and your substance. By continuing the charade of voting for agents obligated to "preserve and protect" the very instrument of your oppression (14th Amendment), you are giving power to your oppressors. This is why the income tax is referred to by the IRS as a "voluntary" tax. It is a contractual obligation that you enter into when you fill out a 1040 form in order to gain employment from a corporate entity, and thus they call it "voluntary". Does this sound dishonest and fraudulent to you? It should, but you enter into contracts of this nature every day: every time you sign your name on a dotted line, or get a driver's license. This is the very nature of Canon Law (commercial law). Everything that a government can give you, it can take away. Once you realize this, you should realize the extreme folly in contracting with such a parasitic illusion.

Until now, I didn't fully realize what Patrick Henry was trying to say in this particular instance:

"Mr. Chairman. .. I rose yesterday to ask a question, which arose in my own mind. When I asked the question. I thought the meaning of my interrogation was obvious: The fate of this question and America may depend on this: Have they said, we the States? Have they made a proposal of a compact between States? If they had, this would be a confederation: It is otherwise most clearly a consolidated government. The question turns, Sir, on that poor little thing-- -- the expression, We the People, instead of the States of America. I need not take much pains to show, that the principles of this system, are extremely pernicious, impolite and dangerous. Is this a Monarchy, like England-- -- a compact between Prince and people; with checks and balances on the former, to secure the liberty of the latter? Is this a Confederacy, like Holland-- -- and association of a number of independent States, each of which retain its individual sovereignty?"

Under the Articles of Confederation, the stile of the document was to be known as "the United States of America", and the commemoration was from "the delegates of the States". It was a compact entered into between sovereign Republics that rested upon their sovereign individual rights to do so, or not to do so. The Constitution was no such compact, but in fact dissolved the sovereignty of the States, and the Republican form of government they represented.

To fully understand this fraud, you have to understand the very specific terms utilized in the Constitution and the organic law of this country (Declaration of Independence and the Articles of Confederation.) Our founders knew exactly what they were doing, thus they did not confuse the words of the founding documents. They used very specific language, with very specifically defined terms. You see, there are two separate entities known as the "United States" and the "United States of America". The "United States" refers to the government entity created by the "Constitution of the United States", which has exclusive jurisdiction and legislative authority within the ten square miles known as the District of Columbia (see Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17). The "United States of America" refers to the Union of Several States that are party to the Constitution, e.g., Virginia, Carolina, Maryland, Pennsylvania, etc.

"The idea prevails with some -- indeed, it found expression in arguments at the bar -- that we have in this country substantially or practically two national governments, one to be maintained under the constitution, with all its restrictions; the other to be maintained by Congress outside and independently of that instrument, by exercising such powers as other nations of the earth are accustomed to exercise. It is one thing to give such a latitudinarian construction to the Constitution as will bring the exercise of power by Congress, upon a particular occasion or upon a particular subject, within its provisions. It is quite a different thing to say that Congress may, if it so elects, proceed outside the Constitution. The glory of our American system of government is that it was created by a written constitution which protects the people against the exercise of arbitrary, unlimited power, and the limits of which instrument may not be passed by the government it created, or by any branch of it, or even by the people who ordained it, except by amendment or change of its provisions.

I take leave to say that if the principles thus announced should ever receive the sanction of a majority of this court, a radical and mischievous change in our system of government will be the result.  We will, in that event, pass from the era of constitutional liberty guarded and protected by a written constitution into an era of legislative absolutism.      It will be an evil day for American liberty if the theory of a government outside of the supreme law of the land finds lodgment in our constitutional jurisprudence.  No higher duty rests upon this court than to exert its full authority to prevent all violation of the principles of the constitution." -- Supreme Court Justice Harlan, disenting opinion in Downes v. Bidwell (1901)

Think of it this way: the several States were united in compact under the Articles of Confederation, much like the various nations of the United Nations are united in compact, while each one supposedly retains its own sovereignty. This federation of several States contracted to form the "United States" government under the Constitution of the "United States". That was the sole purpose of the Constitution, not to guarantee anyone their rights, but to cede some of those rights under contract to the newly created entity known as the United States government, thus creating a centralized military means by which to collect the King's ransom, and to provide for a way to remain compatible with the commercial code system of the Crown. The Bill of Rights were added as a small concession to the Anti-Federalists, when it was realized that the Constitution wouldn't pass. In essence, the "United States of America" were ceding part of their individual sovereignty to the "United States" government, chartered under the Constitution. This was the name that they chose for their new government under the Constitution: the "United States". They could have chosen another name, but that was the name they chose, and this is part of the confusion.

"The rights of a citizen under one [state or United States citizenship] may be quite different from those which he has under the other..." Colgate v. Harvey, 296 US 404, 429.

As our courts have stated several times, a citizen of the United States is not the same thing as a Citizen of a State (United States of America). This is where esquires and banksters have been fooling everyone. By confusing the two different terms, they have defrauded us all of our sovereignty and our rights under the Declaration of Independence. You see, we are all being fooled into contracting with the corporation known as the "United States" (District of Columbia), while thinking that we are retaining our sovereignty within the "United States of America". When you walk into court, claiming the Bill of Rights, the Judge will tell you that you are not party to the Constitution, and therefore it doesn't apply. He won't tell you the reason, but behind closed doors he will have copies of all of the documents that you have signed (bank accounts, loans, Social Security Number, etc.) establishing your equity relationship with the District of Columbia, thus establishing yourself as a 14th Amendment "citizen" with revocable privileges. Like any other contractual agreement that you sign, you have ceded your rights to another and the judge will honor this agreement.

Some idea of what the founders did is related in the first three articles of the Articles of Confederation:

Article I. The Stile of this confederacy shall be "The United States of America".

Article II. Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every Power, Jurisdiction and right, which is not by this confederation expressly delegated to the United States, in Congress assembled.

Article III. The said states hereby severally enter into a firm league of friendship with each other, for their common defence, the security of their Liberties, and their mutual and general welfare, binding themselves to assist each other, against all force offered to, or attacks made upon them, or any of them, on account of religion, sovereignty, trade, or any other pretence whatever.

Essentially, the same limitations on the "United States" can be found (unless ceded through contract) in the ninth and tenth Articles of the Constitution:

Ninth Article of Amendment

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Tenth Article of Amendment

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Clearly, the "United States" and the "States" are not one and the same entity, but the rights not delegated to the "United States" are reserved to the "States" (United States of America). The only way that this does not apply is when you voluntarily cede your rights, through contract, to another. If I sign a nondisclosure form, then I am giving up my First Amendment Rights in this particular instance. It is considered the same voluntary cession by a judge when you fill out a 1040 form, or open a bank account.

To read a more in depth treatment of this scheme, known as "Cooperative Federalism", go here

Are we still on the hook for the tribute and loans owed the king (note that when I say "king" or "Crown", I am referring to the bankers, corporations, and lawyers/esquires that make up the Crown Templar, the actual king or queen is just a figure head, the face of the Vatican) from the corporate charters of Virginia, Carolina, and the Contract of 1782? You bet we are, and we are still making payments to the Crown:

Congressional Record, January 8, 1934 Congressman McFadden: "Why should the United States be buying gold and paying $35 an ounce for it?  Why Should the United States be making Great Britain a present of $14.33 an ounce on the hundreds of millions of dollars of British gold that is being shipped to the United States through this process be favoring four London gold brokers?  Why should the United States set a price of $35 and pay Great Britain an increase of $14.33 on ever ounce of gold?  This is interesting when you consider that three fourths of all the gold produced in the world is produced in the British Empire.  Did we do this because Great Britain demanded it?  Is it  possible that this $14.33 profit to Great Britain on every ounce of gold shipped into the United States is for settlement of a debt that the United States owes to Great Britain?"

Vast amounts of money is funneled out of this country every year, and our gold reserves are completely depleted. One has to wonder where it all goes. It's obviously not going to the American people, nor is it used by our government.

Congressman Wright Patman declared, "In the U.S. today, we have in effect two governments. We have the duly constituted government, then we have an independent, uncontrolled and uncoordinated government in the Federal Reserve, operating the money powers which are reserved to congress by the Constitution."

"If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their money, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them (around the banks), will deprive the people of their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."
Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), US Founding Father

"From now on, depressions will be scientifically created." -- Congressman Charles A.
Lindbergh Sr. , 1913

"Most Americans have no real understanding of the operation of the international money lenders. The accounts of the Federal Reserve System have never been audited. It operates outside the control of Congress and manipulates the credit of the United States" -- Sen. Barry Goldwater (Rep. AR)

"If a private group exercise the power to originate the exchange-medium and then  manipulates the volume of it, that group becomes a power greater than the government itself. It becomes a super-government, paralyzing the efforts of the lawful government for the common good."-- Rev. Dennis Fahey, C.S.Sp

"History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling the money and its issuance."
James Madison (1751-1836), Father of the Constitution for the USA, 4th US President

A most astounding revelation has unearthed itself, documenting everything that I discuss here. A report (dated 1919) that claims to be written by Col. Edward Mendel House, then British banking handler and confidante of President Woodrow Wilson who was instrumental in getting the Federal Reserve Act passed, details the true reasons for WWI and the push for a League of Nations under President Wilson. This chilling document purports to be a progress report written to our financial masters in Great Britain, thus detailing their "thought control" efforts against the American dullards that are so easily manipulated. According to this report, America is being prepared for "the peaceful return of the American Colonies to the dominion of the Crown." Without the slightest reservation, it is laid out clearly how agents of the "Crown" have been placed in positions of authority throughout the country with the express purpose of hoodwinking the American people into complying as serfs to their "Crown" masters. Of course, this process, as I have outlined on this site, has been going on since the Declaration of Independence, but its culmination came under Wilson, the Federal Reserve Act, WWI, and WWII.

Amazingly, this report identifies the key components of "Crown" control in this country, which are financial, educational, governmental, and resource-based oil. J.P. Morgan and Company are identified as key financial officers for the "Crown." It details how the oil industry is conrolled by them, and how the League of Nations (what later became the United Nations) was devised in order to extend "Imperial" control over the world, and how the United States' admission would bring them, unwittingly into the "empire."

This report, or letter, was presented to the House of Representatives by Congressman Thorkelson of Montana, and is published in the Congressional Record of October 13, 1919, p. 598-604 inclusive. Its authenticity was discussed by members of the House and an effort was made to strike it from the Record, which failed. See Congressional Record, October 11, 1939, p.714 et seq.; also of September 9, 1940, p.17835; and September 11, 1940, p.18311.

For your viewing pleasure (or displeasure,) I present a few snippets of this disgusting report:

"From the moment of my arrival here, it was evident to me that such an Anglo-American alliance as would ultimately result in the peaceful return of the American Colonies to the dominion of the Crown could be brought about only with the consent of the dominant group of the controlling clans.

For those who can afford the universities, we are, as I have already mentioned, plentifully supplying British-born or trained professors, lecturers, and presidents. A Canadian-born admiral now heads the United States Naval College. We are arranging for a greater interchange of professors between the two countries. The student interchange could be much improved. The Rhodes scholarships are inadequate in number. I would suggest that the Carnegie trustees be approached to extend to American students the benefits of the scheme by which Scottish students are subsidised at Scottish universities. If necessary, a grant from the treasury should be obtained for this excellent work, which however, should remain for the present -- at least outwardly -- private enterprise...

Through the Red Cross, the Scout movement, the YMC, the church, and other humane, religious, and quasi-religious organizations, we have created an atmosphere of international effort which strengthens the idea of unity of the English-speaking world. In the co-ordination of this work, Mr. Raymond Fosdick, formerly of the Rockefeller Foundation, has been especially conspicuous. I would also like to mention President Nicholas Murray Butler of Columbia University, who has eloquently advocated this form of internationalism and carefully emphasize its distinction from the false internationalism which is infecting the proletariat.

The Overseas Club in this country now contains nearly hundred thousand pledged members with a Journal of their own. Our thanks are due to Lord St. George's, St. David's, St. Andrew's, and Pilgrim Clubs, together with the Daughters of the Empire. the Prince of Wales Fund, and the other association and guilds connected with our multitudinous war charities enable us to pervade all sections and classes of the country, and provide us with a force of empire builders whose loyalty an services are both invaluable to us and highly appreciated by the native colonists.

The censorship, together with our monopoly of cables and our passport control of passengers, enables us to hold all American newspapers as isolated from the non-American world as if they had been in another planet instead of in another hemisphere The realization of this by the Associated Press and the other universal news gatherers -- except Hearst -- was most helpful in bringing only our point of view to the papers they served.

British-born editors and reporters now create imperial sentiment in most American newspapers. As their identity and origins are not usually known, they can talk and write for us as Americans to Americans.

Below that level, imperial unity cannot be securely established upon the debris of the Constitution here. We will not passively permit this unity to be now menaced when it is all but perfect. Has not America, while still maintaining an outward show of independence, yielded to our wishes in the Panama Canal tolls and Canadian fisheries' disputes, as was fitting and filial? Was not America happy to fight our war in Europe? Was not America, like Canada, willing not only to pay her own war expenses but also to loan us money for ours? Was not America, like Canada, content to seek nothing in return for her war duty, so long as the motherland was completely indemnified in Egypt and the rest of Africa, in Persia, Mesopotamia, Syria, and elsewhere? Was not America as proud to be honored by knighthood and lesser titulary distinctions, as Canada was, or, rather, more proud?

Has not President Wilson cancelled the big Navy program and dutifully conceded to us the command of the seas, confident that we shall defend America against all future foes that may threaten our supremacy, just as we defended America and Canada against Germany? In matters lingual, legal and financial, fiscal, commercial, social evangelical, administrative, martial, naval, educational -- are not in all these matters the established relations of America to England, in kind -- if not precisely in degree -- identical with the relations of the other colonies and dominions to the Crown? Indeed, I might justifiably sustain the thesis that so-distant American Republic is now more happily and more closely bound to the Empire than are, for example, the ungrateful and insolent colonies which lately were the Boer Republics.

As long as President Wilson, with our Canadian-born Secretary of the Interior, Mr. Franklin Lane, with our Scotch-born Secretary of Labor, Mr. W. B. Wilson, and with our London-born Mr. Samuel Gompers, -- now controls the administration, imperial unity will daily grow more intimate and more perfect. But I regret to inform you that our committee on American Elections has reported (Appendix 38) that no matter how lavishly we finance the next election, the Wilson administration will pass, and with it, perchance, that absolute administrative control over the Legislature, which has meant so much to us. Willful, wanton, and wicked men will unite in the next election with labor and those industrialists whose profit-patriotism ratio has been allowed to fall below the threshold of loyalty to imperial unity. These combined forces of disorder will seek to elect a legislature which will attempt to make the administration responsible to it, instead of to us and our auxiliaries, and will strive to rend the bonds which bind this colony to the motherland, for the sole, selfish, and seditious purpose of erecting a separate, national, economic unit independent of us -- and even perhaps, competing with us. We must, therefore, hasten to remove from this legislature, with the aid of our supporters here, such of its powers as could be used against imperial unity." Read More Here

What is frightening is that the exact same blueprint for mass propaganda campaigns of mind control are being used to this day, through the same Rockefeller, Carnegie foundations and Tavistock. Not much has changed at all in one hundred years. Things have only gotten worse, as our Universities, media outlets, Hollywood, military-industrial complex, religious organizations, and governing bodies are still controlled by the agents of the "Crown."

One of the most tragic periods in American history was the Great Depression that began with the stock market crash of 1929. It was noted by Nobel laureate Milton Friedman (and many others) that these events were the culmination of actions taken by the Federal Reserve in concert with the Bank of England. Before the creation of the behemoth private trust known as the Federal Reserve, the events of 1929 would not have been possible. Credit was deliberately dried up by the Fed, the market crashed, and the gears of industry came to a stand still, thus millions were rendered jobless and starving as the banks foreclosed on their homes.

"Capital must protect itself in every way... Debts must be collected and loans and mortgages foreclosed as soon as possible. When through a process of law the common people have lost their homes, they will be more tractable and more easily governed by the strong arm of the law applied by the central power of leading financiers. People without homes will not quarrel with their leaders. This is well known among our principle men now engaged in forming an imperialism of capitalism to govern the world. By dividing the people we can get them to expend their energies in fighting over questions of no importance to us except as teachers of the common herd."--  J.P. Morgan 

This is what the newly sworn in President had to say about the situation:

In his first inaugural address, March 4, 1933, President Roosevelt said of the Great Depression, "Values have shrunk to fantastic levels; taxes have risen; our ability to pay has fallen; . . . the withered leaves of industrial enterprise lie on every side; farmers find no market for their produce; the savings of many years in thousands of families are gone. More important a host of unemployed citizens face the grim problem of existence, and an equally great number toil with little return . . . Yet our distress comes from no failure of substance . . . Nature still offers her bounty. Plenty is at our doorstep, but a generous use of it languishes in the very sight of supply. Primarily this is because the rulers [MONEY-CHANGERS] of the exchange [banks] of mankind's goods have failed, . . . have admitted their failure and have abdicated. Practices of the unscrupulous money-changers stand indicted in the court of public opinion, rejected by the hearts and minds of men . . . They know only the rules of a generation of self-seekers . . . Yes, the money-changers have fled from their high seats in the temple of our civilization. We may now restore that temple to the ancient truths. The measure of that restoration lies in the extent to which we apply social values more noble than mere monetary profit."

It sounds like the "money-changers" were about to be chased out of the Temple. Don't worry... It was all talk. FDR was firmly in the pockets of the "money-changers", which was clearly indicated by his declaration of a banking holiday and the confiscation of the American people's gold. Which he promptly gave to the "money-changers".

Patrick Henry warned of the potential abuses of the executive branch, opposing the Constitution and the wealthy Federalists that spawned it, whose loyalties often seemed to be somewhere else. He warned that the office of the Presidency had all of the markings of a Kingly tyrant. How prophetic he has been. "What do you mean?" you say. "We have checks and balances," you say. Not really. The Executive branch has usurped the powers of the Judicial and Legislative branches of our government. The office of the President of the United States has all of the power of a King and much more. He can write laws and declare war as he chooses, without ever consulting Congress or the Supreme Court. For example, we have thousands of Executive Orders that are issued by the President on a yearly basis, most of which go completely unnoticed and unreported by our news agencies. For instance, we have this wonderful Executive Order issued by Franklin Delano Roosevelt:

On April 5, 1933, President and Traitor Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the following Executive Order: "By virtue of the authority vested in me by Section 5 (B) of the Act of Oct. 6, 1917, as amended by Section 2 of the Act of March 9, 1933, entitled `An Act to provide relief in the existing national emergency in banking and for other purposes', in which a mandatory Act Congress declared that a serious emergency exists, I Franklin D. Roosevelt, President of the United States of America, do declare that said national emergency still continues to exist and pursuant to said section do hereby prohibit the hoarding of gold coins, gold bullion, and gold certificates within the continental United States by individuals and corporations . . .

All persons are hereby required to deliver on or before May 1, 1933 to a Federal Reserve bank or agency thereof or any member bank of the Federal Reserve System all gold coin, gold bullion and gold certificates now owned by them or coming into their ownership on or before April 28, 1933, except the following:

(b) Gold coin or gold certificates in an amount not exceeding in the aggregate $100.00 belonging to any one person; and gold coins having been recognized special value to collectors of rare and unusual coins . . 

Section 9; Whoever willfully violates any provisions of this Executive Order or of these regulations or of any rule, regulations, or license issued there under may be fined not more than $10,000, or, if a natural person, may be imprisoned for not more than ten years, or both . . ."

If a President can issue an Executive Order stealing the wealth of the American people, then he can essentially issue any order that he chooses, and Presidents across history have done just that. Why not an Executive Order establishing Martial Law? Oh wait, that's already been done. In fact, we have been under a state of Emergency War Powers since the Civil War; a condition that was amended (declaring war against every American citizen in 1933) by FDR and still afflicts us to this day. Sound too terrible to be true? Consider the fact that we were not at war with anyone in 1933... who else could FDR declare war against? The President, under Emergency War Powers, has unlimited power to declare war and control all aspects of the government and the economy. For instance, under such conditions the President can issue an order to start rounding people up and placing them in concentration camps, much like FDR did with Japanese Americans during WWII. Clearly, an arbitrary power of this kind placed in anyone's hands alone is an affront to the personal liberty of the people.

There have been over 13,000 Executive Orders (and those are just the ones that have been recorded), not counting National Security directives, that have been issued by Presidents over the years. Think about that number for a minute. That's tantamount to 13,000 amendments to the Constitution. Clearly, the President was never supposed to have this kind of power under our tri branch system of checks and balances.

It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government has been dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1, Public Law 89-719; Declared by President Roosevelt, being bankrupt and insolvent. H. J. R. 192, 73rd. Congress in session June 5, 1933 - Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard and Abrogate The Gold Clause dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all United States Government Offices, Officers and Departments and is further evidence that the United States Federal Government exists today in name only.--

Representative Traficant Reports On The Bankruptcy Of The United States, United States Congressional Record, March 17, 1993 VOL. 33, page H-1303

"In 1933 the U.S. declared bankruptcy, as expressed in Roosevelt's Executive Orders 6073, 6102, 6111, and 6260, House Joint Resolution 192 of June 5, 1933 confirmed in "Perry v. U.S. (1935) 294 U.S. 330-381, 79 LEd 912, as well as 31 United States Code (USC) 5112, 5119 and 12 USC 95a."[2]

 Today we are the inheritors of a bankrupt country, whose great legacy has been soiled. Our ancestors were duped and conned into giving up their own freedoms and the freedoms of their children’s' children by those that wish to rule this country by the same tyranny that Patrick Henry and others risked their lives to usurp. A giant private corporation (The Federal Reserve banking conglomerate) has set America up as a money-laundering front with you as its economic slaves. If Wal-mart were set up as the sole arbiter of your money and economic freedom, causing depression and war, while increasing the wealth of but a few over the masses, would not the people clamor for reparations? A giant private corporation does control the money of this country, and yet we all sit silent? It is a powerful entity indeed that can silence all public criticism. When was the last time that you heard monetary policy, or the actions of the Federal Reserve as any part of a public debate? Those that control our money also use the power of government to control and manipulate what we hear on the news, and what we learn in school. We are their slaves in every sense of the word.

Senate Document No. 43, we find this startling truth, "The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State; individual so-called 'ownership' is by virtue of government, i.e., law, amounting to mere user; and must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State."

"Our Founding Fathers believed that it was self-evident that the God of Nature is the sovereign of the universe and everything in it (as well as mankind) and that He had endowed all mankind with "certain unalienable rights" making them self-directing sovereigns on par with the king himself, which means that any governments instituted among men derive their just powers (only) from the consent of the governed, who are the source of earthly power and authority. Hence any attempt to exercise any powers NOT conveyed by the People is unjust and unauthorized, and any act done pursuant to such usurpation of power is void."

"Through the Federal Reserve Board over a billion of American money has been pumped into Germany. You have all heard of the spending that has taken place in Germany..."--Congressman Louis T.McFadden (D-PA) who served twelve years as Chairman of the Committee on Banking and Currency.(1935)

So infectious has the level of brainwashing been over the past fifty years that one is surprised to learn that current American society is not predicated on anything derived from our Founding Fathers, but is in fact a reflection of the Communist Manifesto. It gained momentum in the early 1900's with the illegal passage of the Federal Reserve Act, and it culminated in the out right destruction of all property rights by FDR in 1933. We have been a communist utopia in the model of his best friend Joseph Stalin ever since. All of this makes perfect sense when one realizes that we were funding both sides of WWII. Oh yes, the biggest contributors to the Nazi and Soviet parades were American corporate entities and our very own Federal Reserve. Think about it... How did Germany go from broke to being one of the premiere economic powers in the world in only a few short years? Where did all of that gold that FDR stole from the American public go? From the Union Banking Corporation, to Rockefeller, to IBM, to Ford, to GM, they were all aiding and abetting the enemies of America. If you want to believe that Germany rose again from the ashes overnight due to some miracle, and that American gold just vanished from the earth, then it is your prerogative, but it sounds like a personal problem to me. Like the Cold War that followed, it was all one big sham that allowed the moneyed class to call to itself unnatural power and control the fortunes of the world. The nature and cause of all war is monetary. The historical record on this is clear, if you have eyes to see.

"A majority of the people of the United States have lived all of their lives under emergency rule. For 40 years, freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have, in varying degrees, been abridged by laws brought into force by states of national emergency. The problem of how a constitutional democracy reacts to great crises, however, far antedates the Great Depression. As a philosophical issue, its origins reach back to the Greek city-states and the Roman Republic. And, in the United States, actions taken by the Government in times of great crises have-from, at least, the Civil War-in important ways, shaped the present phenomenon of a permanent state of national emergency."-- 93d Congress SENATE Report No. 93-549, 1973

Some fools contend that all of this is nothing but mere fancy, and that we are the freest country on the planet, but such illusions cannot square themselves with the facts. Have you ever asked yourself why you do the things that you do? Why you eat with a fork as opposed to chopsticks? The answer is inevitably: I do the things that I do because that is what "they" (the world around me) does. You are a product of your environment. When one realizes this, then it should become painfully obvious why you get out of bed everyday and go to the same dead-end job, working for the same giant conglomerate that lobbies in Washington for more of your subsidized tax dollars, that are stolen from your paycheck without your consent, without giving it all a second thought. The same conglomerate that lobbies in Washington for legislation forcing you to carry their insurance, buy their products and services, vote for their candidates, and eat their junk food. Because you were born into a system! But don't be deluded into thinking that it has always been this way, or that you have any real control over the way things are. Oh no, you have been swept away by a system that was in place long before you were born. A system whose very nature has been hidden from your grandparents, your parents, and now you. That's right, believe it or not, you were born into a state of involuntary servitude.

Wealth is accumulated in New York, and not because those men are more industrious than we are, not because they are wiser and better, but because they trade, because they buy and sell, because they deal in usury, because they reap in what they have never earned, because they take in and live off what other men earn.... The West and the South have made you people rich.-- Senator William Peffer, 1893

Of course, all of these companies are owned and run by the same money changers, and are controlled by the hundreds of government bureaucracies that run and control all of our lives. All of this made possible by the Federal Reserve System(fascism.) Why do you need a Driver's License, a Business License, a Social Security Number, etc.? When one looks at the facts, it is plain to see that we are one of the most regulated societies on earth. We can no longer eat, sleep, or drink without the government telling us how to do it. Was this the America that our founders envisioned? While the Soviet Union was an overt dictatorship, it would appear that the American experiment since 1913 has been a covert operation designed to slowly boil its people to death, while convincing them that they are taking a warm bath. So many Americans claim to be free, yet they have no understanding of the meaning of the word.

Can you hear that giant sucking sound? That is the sound of the wealth of America being sucked out of this country by transnational corporate looters. "Oh, but corporations help us all, and capitalism is good... You know, the invisible hand, etc., etc.." Really? Did you know that corporations were frowned upon by many of our founding fathers, and this was well before they had achieved the great power and influence that they have stolen from our courts and halls of government today. Do not be fooled by the semantic tricks played on the public today by the elitists, which confuse free market capitalism with fascism, socialism, and communism. Corporations have played a major role in totalitarianism since the days of Roman conquest and the founding of the "New World".

We tend to think of corporations as fairly recent phenomena, the Legacy of the Rockefellers and Carnegies. In fact, the corporate presence In pre revolutionary America was almost as conspicuous as it is today. There were far fewer corporations then, but they were enormously powerful: the Massachusetts Bay Company, the Hudson's Bay Company, the British East India Company. Colonials feared these "chartered" entities, just as today, those who have educated themselves, fear the chartered corporate entities known as the District of Columbia and the Federal Reserve.

Why is the military overburdened with fancy weapons, but the troops underpaid and unable to operate most of their equipment due to a lack of training and spare parts? Because there is little profit to the multi-national corporations in spare parts, and none in pay for the troops.-- David Gould

Ever since corporations were granted the legal status of "personhood" by the Supreme Court case Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railway in 1886, their power and influence combined with limited liability have controlled this nation. They have been the very tools of the moneychangers, through Roman/Babylonian Law, for subjugating us all to them. Do not be fooled. These corporate cartels do not represent capitalism, but are a system born of fascism. They can only thrive in a market they control through the aid and force of government.

The dismantling of our manufacturing base, however, is a subject that should make daily headlines but is seldom discussed in the mainstream. It's crucially important because one has to wonder how any nation can avoid eventual decline when it allows its manufacturing to be done abroad, reduces its need for a highly trained work force and ends up destroying its middle class that made it prosper in the first place. There are distinguished thinkers who believe as I do that the US has seen its better days and is now in a downward trajectory economically. Unless a way is found to reverse this destructive trend, the US will be Number One only in military spending and waging wars. And no nation in history based on militarism and conquest has ever not failed ultimately to destroy itself.-- Stephen Lendman

Thanks to trade organizations (charters) and associations designed to cement corporate power over sovereign nations and people, such as the WTO and NAFTA, the manufacturing base of America is nearly non-existent today, precipitating a considerable fall in the standard of living for most, and the destruction of the middle class. Most or all of the good jobs are being shipped overseas, while the common worker is increasingly left with a choice of low-paying, low-benefit jobs in the service industry or unemployment, which if reflected in Great Depression era statistical analysis, would be over 12 percent. The other 78 percent of the so-called employed are mostly made up of low paying jobs in the service sector. This leaves a giant chasm between rich and poor, with the buffer (middle class) between the two becoming thinner and thinner. Like the Conquistadors and other European powers who bled the "New World" dry, the wealth of America is being systematically dismantled and shipped over seas.

The lack of good job opportunities for a growing population of ill-prepared young people is also a major reason for the growth of our prison population that now exceeds 2.1 million, is the largest in the world even ahead of China with over four times our population, and is incarcerating about 900 new prisoners every week. I wrote a recent heavily documented article about this called The US Gulag Prison System.-- Stephen Lendman, Art. Hostile Takeover: The Corporate Control of Society and Human Life.

Today, the Bill of Rights is left severely incomplete. The monetary powers of the country should be reserved to the people alone and permanently defended from private corporate hands. The Anti-Federalists (Thomas Jefferson, Patrick Henry, etc.) desired two more Amendments be added to the Constitution's Bill of Rights, including "freedom from monopolies in commerce" (what are modern day transnational corporations) and "freedom from a permanent military". Of course, the powerful Federalists got these two bills dropped from the original Bill of Rights, and the rest is our demise.

"For the stark choice before us always is: gold (or silver), or government."-- Murray N. Rothbard (economist).

This is what our money looked like before FDR and his bankster masters destroyed all property rights in this country:

"Notice in the base of the pyramid the Roman date MDCCLXXVI which is written in Roman numerals for the year 1776. The words ANNUIT COEPTIS NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM are Roman Latin for ANNOUNCING THE BIRTH OF THE NEW ORDER OF THE WORLD. [Go back to the definitions above and pay particular attention to the words CAPITOL, CROWN and TEMPLE.] 1776 signifies the birth of the New World Order under the Crown Temple. That's when their American Crown Colonies became the chartered government called the United States, thanks to the Declaration of Independence. Since that date, the United Nations (another legal Crown Temple by charter) rose up and refers to every nation as a State member."[3]

Notice the "In Gold Coin" and "Payable To The Bearer On Demand". Now notice a FRN (Fed Note) with all of these markers of REAL money missing, plus a few added symbols from the New World Order/Illuminati. In 1933 FDR placed this conspicuous looking ancient Egyptian/Babylonian occult symbol on our dollar, abrogated the gold standard, and confiscated the only REAL means by which Americans had to pay off their debts (their gold.) A FRN was still redeemable in silver up until 1965, now it is redeemable in nothing but paper IOU's, which are, in effect, nothing. The toilet paper in your bathroom has more intrinsic value than a modern Federal Reserve Note.

Once the banksters had the gold of America, every American was now indebted to them (the government immediately borrowed credit from the international bankers with you and your property as the collateral.) With no way to lawfully discharge their debts (lawfully, one can only pay his debts with REAL money (gold or silver) and not a money substitute, such as a Federal Reserve IOU), the American citizen was forced into debt slavery (usury) to the corporate international bankers. This is what happened in 1933 with the confiscation of American gold and the declared bankruptcy of our Federal Government, which is why we have a national debt (interest owed to the bankers) to the tune of 8.1 trillion dollars. This is why America is the largest debtor nation in the world, and our society is completely based on debt and credit. It is all smoke and mirrors, which has made possible the Agricultural Depression of 1920-21, the Great Depression of the 1930's, and the market crashes of 1962, 1974, 1987, and 2000. We are well over due for the largest one yet. It is only a matter of time.

"For that privilege section 16 of the act provides that when the Government prints a Federal Reserve note and guarantees to pay that note and delivers it to a Federal Reserve bank, that Federal Reserve bank shall pay--it seems to be mandatory--the rate of interest that is set by the Federal Reserve Board.  The law has never been put into effect.   The Federal Reserve Board sets the zero rate.  Instead of charging an interest rate which the law says they shall charge, they set no rate at all.       Therefore, for the use of this great Government credit, these blanket mortgages that are issued against all the property of all the people of this Nation and against the incomes of all the people of this Nation, they do not pay one penny.  Not one penny of the stack of the Federal Reserve banks is owned by the Government or the people, but it is owned by private banks exclusively."-- Congressional Record, March 15, 1934 Congressman Patman

"Under the doctrine of Parens Patriae, or "Government As Parent" - as a result of the manipulated bankruptcy of the United States in 1930, ALL of the assets of the American people, their person - and our entire country - are ALL held by the *Depository Trust Corporation, 55 Water Street, New York, NY* and secured by Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) Commercial Liens, which are then monetized as "debt money" by the Federal Reserve.[1]

Under the umbrella of the Depository Trust Corporation lies the CEDE Corporation, Federal Reserve Corporation and American Bar Association -- the "legal arm" of the private banking interests!"

You might take exception to the name at 55 Water St. in NYC:

If the self description "tower of power" doesn't give you a clue, then what will?

Money, by definition, functions within society as a medium of exchange, i.e., you exchange your time (labor hours) in exchange for a paycheck denominated in Federal Reserve Notes, which you trade for the necessities that your living requires. In other words, money can be defined as compartmentalized time. Thus, money is the tool by which you can store your valuable time for when you need it most. If you need some eggs, you no longer have to raise a chicken and wait for it to mature enough to lay an egg, but you can now take your stored time value (money) and trade it for some eggs at the local grocer. An exchange has occurred here: you have traded your time value denominated in dollars for the grocers time value denominated in eggs. This is where they get the phrase "medium of exchange". In the past, people used their time in order to build their dwellings, raise and hunt for food, make their own clothing, etc. With the invention of money and the barter system, they discovered that they could save valuable time through the exchange markets. Money facilitates this exchange of time and the ingenuity and production that it fosters.

Money that is backed by nothing, i.e., it was not produced by someone's time and production, nor does it have any tangible value of its own, e.g., gold, silver, eggs, chickens, furniture, and other forms of production barter, is a debt instrument or IOU. It is the same as stealing. The system works because you can successfully pass on the debt owed by the original issuer of the fiat money to another and essentially steal their production, and they can then turn around and pass this debt onto another, etc. But this process cannot go on forever. Eventually, it comes time to pay the piper, and in the long run we all end up paying for it in the form of burdensome taxes, inflation and the military subjugation of the police state. Who really suffers from all of this? The wealthy benefit the most because they are the first ones with the new fiat money and credit to pass it on; it is the middle class and the poor that feel the squeeze and ultimately pays the heaviest price. This is nothing more than pure wealth redistribution; the powerful and the wealthy (the parasitic elites) are stealing from everyone else, while they lecture the middle class on not doing enough (pay more taxes), and on using up too many of their beloved resources (useless eaters that must be eliminated.) Monetary control is what makes totalitarianism possible. The first thing that a dictator tries to do is take control of the money supply. That is why central banking is the most important tenet of the Communist Manifesto.

The Federal Reserve (which is not part of the government), in their endless quest for greed, has, through color of law (statutory code) created monopolistic control over the exchange medium in America. This monopolized medium, called a Federal Reserve Note, serves as bankruptcy script for the United States Government, the use of which, under common law, becomes like a gratuity or gift. Thus, Federal Reserve Notes (a note is an obligation, e.g. promissory note) “is an obligation of the UNITED STATES under the Brenton Woods agreement of 1947 (an obligation to the Federal Reserve), and are based on SDRs (Special Drawing Rights (under bankruptcy) according to the international bankruptcy of the corporate UNITED STATES.”[5]

"How free or how equal, can any man be when he must consume his time to earn the necessities of life, compared to the man who is privileged, by fear/force of government, to create the exchangeable storage unit of Time [money] out-of-thin-air? The Privilege, which is ordained by statute, to create from nothing, an exchange unit with which to steal the Time of the citizens of the nation, creates the bondage of men, which is simply the owning of the labor (Time) of men. That is all this or any bondage is -- the owning of the labor (Time) of a man. No matter what name the bondage is done under, i.e., slave, resident, serf, or peon -- bondage is simply control of the time that a man must consume in order to survive.

It is a Maxim of Law that from nothing comes nothing. When a banker creates from nothing the exchange unit with which to steal the labor/Time of the residents of his town, that is exactly what he has created -- nothing. Man can only create NOTHING! Man does not have the power of God! And from that "nothing," flows only waste, despair, grief, slavery, and virtually every ill that stalks this once great land."--David Gould[5]

"When the Federal Reserve Banks and National Banks acquire United States Bonds and Securities, State Bonds and Securities, State Subdivision Bonds and Securities, mortgages on private Real property and mortgages on private personal property, the said banks create the money and credit upon their books by bookkeeping entry. The first time that the money comes into existence is when they create it. The banks create it out of nothing. No substantial fund of gold or silver is back of it, or any fund at all . . ."-- Judge Mahoney

"There is no doubt but what the law is that a national bank cannot lend its credit or become an accommodation endorser." (National Bank of Commerce vs. Atkinson, 55 Fed Rep 465)

"There is a distinction between a 'debt discharged' and a debt 'paid'. When discharged, the debt still exists though divested of it's charter as a legal obligation during the operation of the discharge, something of the original vitality of the debt continues to exist, which may be transferred, even though the transferee takes it subject to it's disability incident to the discharge." --Stanek vs. White, 172 Minn.390, 215 N.W. 784

Have you ever wondered why a pack of gum that cost you 25 cents when you were a kid now costs over a dollar? Why does it seem that people are working longer and harder these days for less gain? In the 50's, a family could easily be supported by a single income with enough left over for a nice vacation or a brand new car, leaving Mom home with the kids. Today the average family is lucky to get by on at least two incomes, sometimes three, which leaves the children to be raised by strangers at daycare or Government-run schools (our children need at least one parent at home, whether it be Mom or Dad.) We have been so busy and distracted by grueling work schedules, sports, and television, etc., that we haven't noticed that our money has lost ten times its value (inflation) over the past 25 years. Think about that figure for a minute.... TEN TIMES ITS VALUE! No wonder we are working so hard and getting nowhere. No wonder there is an overwhelming sense of hopelessness in today's society that leads our overly stressed souls, like a moth to a flame, to find distractions in baseball, American Idol, anything but reality. Like Roman times, the Emperor hopes to keep us distracted by gladiatorial games, while he robs us blind. The Government loves this little scenario because it knows what the real cause of inflation is, and it hopes that you will be too busy, confused, and distracted to figure it out.

"I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men." -- President Woodrow Wilson, discussing his role in the passage of the Federal Reserve Act

Brace yourself, here is another sobering figure for your enjoyment: the 1913 (before the Federal Reserve) dollar is worth around 4 cents today. That is a 96 percent decrease in its purchasing power. Since 2001 alone, the dollar has lost 60 percent of its value. We are all feeling this great burden, and it is the height of irresponsibility to continue passing on this great debt to future generations.

Our Government doesn't want you to know what causes inflation. Over the years Government, and its goons in our educational system, have sufficiently brainwashed us all into believing that Government, and its conquering hero Fed Chairman, are our savior from inflation; but make no mistake, inflation is not caused by oil prices or by crazed consumers, but by monetary policy, i.e., Government. It is monetary inflation that is the major cause of price inflation. Recently, the Fed announced that it was no longer going to report its monetary aggregate M3 (our best gauge of monetary inflation is the M3 report given to us by the Fed, which was discontinued in March.) One has to wonder what has made the Fed so jittery that they are now hiding the M3 report from us? There is no doubt that our current dollar is on very shaky ground and bound for total collapse. When this happens, it will make the Great Depression look like a picnic.

"Every Congressman, every Senator knows precisely what causes inflation...but can't, [won't] support the drastic reforms to stop it [repeal of the Federal Reserve Act]because it could cost him his job." -- Robert A. Heinlein, Expanded Universe

Did you know that you could still buy gasoline at 25 cents a gallon (the price of gas when our dollars were still backed by something)? Guess what? You can still buy four gallons of gas with the same amount of silver as when you could buy four gallons with a dollar. Oh yes, silver has maintained its value quite well over the past several decades, while our dollar has lost a considerable sum of its purchasing power. You see, it isn't the price of oil that has necessarily gone up, but the purchasing power of our counterfeit G-bills that has been lost. This is the inevitability of a fiat money system. Believe me, our politicos in Washington will try to make a scapegoat out of certain oil companies, when the real culprit will be sitting behind the throne in D.C.. They will try to tell us that the oil companies are gouging us, when the reality is that it is the Federal Reserve System that is gouging us all. But who has the education to understand such a complicated fraud? Read the information on this web site and you will.

Don't get me wrong... no one loves their country more than I do, and it is expressly because of my love for my country that I can't stand by and allow it to be taken over by insidious forces. As JamesTraficant said before he was carted off to prison based on trumped up racketeering charges (apparently political prisoners are a dime a dozen in this free country)-- "I love my country, but I hate my government". After all, our Founding Fathers had no love for Government; in fact, they went out of their way to limit government via the Constitution for the United States of America. Unfortunately, this same Constitution has been used to enslave us all, while providing the guise of freedom. It is not a Constitution that grants us our rights, but moral and natural law. That is why these rights are "unalienable" and we cannot truly be separated from them.

"The Federal Reserve and National Banks exercise an exclusive monopoly and privilege of creating credit and issuing their notes at the expense of the public, which does not receive a fair equivalent. This scheme is obliquely designed for the benefit of an idle monopoly to rob, blackmail and oppress the producers of wealth. . . It has defied the lawfully Constituted Government . . .

Slavery and all its incidents, including Peonage, thralldom and debt created by fraud is universally prohibited in the United States. This case represents but another form of Slavery by the Bankers. Their position is not supported by the Constitution. The people [jury] have spoken their will in terms which cannot be misunderstood. It is indispensable to the preservation of the Union and independence and liberties of the people that this Court adhere only to mandates of the Constitution and administer it as written . . ."-- Justice of the Peace Martin V. Mahoney, First National Bank vs. Jerome Daly

 The majority nonetheless remain subjects and slaves to, of and for a minority who claim ruling privileges due to some bewildering intellectual ability or divine right. To explain the foregoing sentence from a different perspective - we humans thought it was and is our right or duty to domesticate plants and animals, but for some strange reason never gave or give much thought about the few human predators accomplishing the same trick on their fellow man. Yet, the American people steadfastly believe they are free.

The following information comes from the on-line book titled The United States is Still a British Colony, which can be found at ‘www.civil-liberties.com’.

       "As further evidence, not that any is needed, a percentage of taxes that are paid are to enrich the king/queen of England. For those that study Title 26 you will recognize IMF, which means Individual Master File, all taxpayers have one. To read one you have to be able to break their codes using file 6209, which is about 467 pages. On your IMF you will find a blocking series, which tells you what type of tax you are paying. You will probably find a 300-399 blocking series, which 6209 says is reserved. You then look up the BMF 300-399, which is the Business Master File in 6209. You would have seen prior to 1991, this was U.S.-U.K. Tax Claims, non-refile DLN. Meaning everyone is considered a business and involved in commerce and you are being held liable for a tax via a treaty between the U.S. and the U.K., payable to the U.K.. The form that is supposed to be used for this is form 8288, FIRPTA - Foreign Investment Real Property Tax Account, you won't find many people using this form, just the 1040 form. The 8288 form can be found in the Law Enforcement Manual of the IRS, chapter 3. If you will check the OMB's paper - Office of Management and Budget, in the Department of Treasury, List of Active Information Collections, approved Under Paperwork Reduction Act, you will find this form under OMB number 1545-0902, which says U.S. withholding tax-return for dispositions by foreign persons of U.S. real property interests-statement of withholding on dispositions, by foreign persons, of U.S. Form #8288 #8288a.

       These codes have since been changed to read as follows; IMF 300-309, Barred Assessment, CP 55 generated valid for MFT-30, which is the code for 1040 form. IMF 310-399 reserved, the BMF 300-309 reads the same as IMF 300-309. BMF 390-399 reads U.S./U.K. Tax Treaty Claims. The long and short of it is nothing changed, the government just made it plainer, the 1040 is the payment of a foreign tax to the king/queen of England. We have been in financial servitude since the Treaty of 1783."

"Ah, but we have property rights in America." Really? Do you hold clear allodial title to the lands that you supposedly "own"? The answer is no. You have been reduced to that of a common serf that must pay tribute to feudal lords in the form of property and other taxes in order to rent property, but never own it outright. "But our government needs taxes in order to function." Wrong again! The fact of the matter is that our governments keep a second set of books (Enron style) where they are raking it in on investments in securities, etc., plus they have many Constitutional means for revenue, such as taxes on duties, excises, imposts, etc.

"Several weeks ago, comes along Walter Burien on Mr. Tibler's show with disclosure as to the existence of the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) which showed within Arkansas, with a population of 2.5 million people who had a TOTAL assessed Property value of 18.3 Billion (1996), THAT just the state government CAFR report showed of in excess of 16 Billion in combined total liquid investment funds, verging on being equal to the total hard assets and wealth of the citizens of the state of Arkansas as determined by their property value. Teachers pension funds = to 5.7 Billion (how many teachers are there in Arkansas for the children of 2.5 M people ? ). State investment funds (Arkansas Development Finance Authority-ADFA, for issuance of bonds back to themselves or the local government = to 1.4 Billion. Total cash intake for the year 1.9 Billion NOTE: these figures are just for the state, not adding on for composite investment totals of Cities and Counties within Arkansas which would bring the total up to 26-28 Billion."[6]

The income tax Amendment (16th amendment) came into existence in 1913, coinciding with the creation of the Federal Reserve System, and as is to be expected, according to a Government study in the 80's called the Grace Commission, all income tax revenue goes to paying off the private bankers of the Federal Reserve (national debt), and none of it goes to paying for actual Government functions or services. When the government can create money from thin air (monetizing the debt), it doesn't need to tax its citizens for revenue; it has other, more oppressive reasons for taxing its citizens. Before 1913, the national debt did not exist, our government was wondering what to do with its surplus, and the income tax was nearly non-existent, while the IRS was still merely an illegally chartered organization used for extracting tribute from the conquered Southern States after the Civil War. Now, with astronomical national debts and the American citizen being taxed more ways than he can count, while being terrorized by the bankster's Gestapo in the IRS, we are constantly told that our government needs more money. All of this makes perfect sense when one realizes that the progressive income tax is one of the key pillars mentioned in the Communist Manifesto. It's commonsense folks! If the government had unlimited power to tax (which it doesn't, according to the Constitution, as stated by the Supreme Court) then it would have unlimited power, period. It is every American's patriotic duty to stop supporting a corrupt Government and its tyrannous tax fraud. Obviously, you are not free when you are forced to pay tribute to a King, yet it has been programmed into the American psyche that it is their patriotic duty to allow such a tyranny to be perpetrated upon them by the foreign usurpers that have stolen their Government.

"Now, I direct your attention to 27 CFR 250.11 again for the definition of "Secretary" as found in all the above. The defining term for "Secretary" is, "The Secretary of the Treasury of Puerto Rico." That man is Manual Diaz Saldana. Those revenue agents operating in the all the states are not United States employees. The Statute mandated to be at the end of each regulation by 1 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) is 68A State 775 (26 USC 6301). (The men I work with sue Manual Diaz Saldana directly in every IRS case they take on.)"

'He's the head honcho. Also, you are usually dealing with an agent with a title of "Revenue Agent." The only definition of revenue agent is in 27 C.F.R.section 250.11 and is defined as: "Revenue Agent means any duly authorized Commonwealth Internal Revenue Agent of the Department of the Treasury of Puerto Rico."' -- Dan Meador

The fact of the matter is that the IRS is not part of the U.S. government, nor is it a part of the United States of America. It operates out of a Federal territory under the jurisdiction of the District of Columbia called Puerto Rico. You must contract within its jurisdiction in order to be subject to its taxes. You do this by having a bank account, bank loan, using a credit card, Social Security Number, Driver's License, filling out a 1040, etc.

The income tax, as we know it today, is purely a manifestation of the 20th Century and its Federal Reserve System. Its ancestor started as a "temporary" war tax enacted by Congress in 1862 to help finance the Civil War, and ended in 1872 after Reconstruction. But the clamor for an income tax was heard again in 1894, as the great divide between rich and poor was ever more prevalent. This chasm was created by the banks, as well as this campaign for a national income tax. One wise member of Congress at the time had this to say about it:

"The imposition of the [income] tax will corrupt the people. It will bring in its train the spy and the informer. It will necessitate a swarm of officials with inquisitorial powers. It will be a step toward centralization.. It breaks another canon of taxation in that it is expensive in its collection and cannot be fairly imposed. . . and, finally, it is contrary to the traditions and principles of republican government."

A challenge went all the way to the Supreme Court in 1895, where it was struck down (this was back when the Supremes actually did their job, before the American Bar Association could totally corrupt them.) The majority opinion, as written by Justice Stephen J. Field, quoted another case:

"There is no such thing in the theory of our national government as unlimited power of taxation in congress. There are limitations, as he justly observes, of its powers arising out of the essential nature of all free governments; there are reservations of individual rights, without which society could not exist, and which are respected by every government. The right of taxation is subject to these limitations."

Unlimited power to tax is unlimited power, period! This is all the power that a tyrannical government needs, which is why every dictatorship in the 20th century featured an income tax of some sort. Forget the Bill of Rights, if your government can tax you at will, then your government can do with you as it pleases. Money is, after all, everything.

Have you ever stopped to ponder why the income tax system is so complicated? Only a complete idiot would create such a complicated racket, unless its confusion is deliberate. The complexity of the Internal Revenue Code has created an army of specialized lawyers and accountants. Tax season is now a tax software, tax preparation services bonanza, as every April 15th Americans clamor (volunteer according to the IRS) to turn in their taxes. Even reform bills are stupefyingly complicated, often approaching a thousand pages. Is this necessary, especially when FICA taxes are already taken directly out of your paycheck before you even see it? Obviously, this oppressive behemoth is designed to terrorize the people that it entraps. A people kept in constant confusion and fear of their government will comply with any demands, even armed robbery by the Fed.

“If you were to go back and try to find and review the ratification of the 16th Amendment, which was the internal revenue, income tax, I think if you went back and examined that carefully, you would find that a sufficient number of states never ratified that amendment…And nonetheless, I think it is fair to say that it is part of the constitution of the United States, and I don’t think any court would ever set it aside.
Well, I’ve seen that – I’ve seen somewhere a treatise on that, and I think it was --- I think I’m correct in saying that actually the ratification never really properly occurred…Yet nonetheless, I’m sure no court’s going to say that the 16th Amendment permitting income tax is void for any reason…I think there may be something analogous there vis a vis the continued practice of the Executive to have incursions and police actions or to commit the country to hostilities without the formal declaration of war.”-- District Court Judge James C. Fox (2003) in defense of the Presidents invasion of Iraq without an official declaration of war.

The Burden of taxation has fallen upon the working middle class, as peonage and slavery have become commonplace American ideals. The all-powerful government has become completely dependant upon the forced labor of every man, woman, and child within its domicile. Here are the sobering figures taken straight from government sources:

Annual Federal Income

(In Billions)

FY 2005

FY 1913

Individual Income Taxes
874
43%
0
0%
Social Security Income Taxes
794
39%
0
0%

Labor Taxes 

1668

82%

 

0

0%

           
Corporation Income Taxes

230

11%
 

0.035

a) 10%
Excise Taxes, Customs, Duties

95

4%
 

0.309

b) 90%
Estate and Gift Taxes
21
1%
 
0
c) 0
Miscellaneous
37
2%
 
0
0

Corporate, Customs & Misc. Taxes 

383

18%

0.344

100%

           

TOTAL REVENUE (Billions)

2,051

100%

 

0.344

d) 100%

           

Notes:

a) 1913 corp. income tax was an excise tax
b) 1913, primarily alcohol, tobacco, etc.
c) Estate tax started in 1916, Gift in 1924
d) 2005 revenue is 5,962 times higher than 1913

Source: Whitehouse OMB 2005 Budget

Source: 1913 Annual Commissioner's Report

Source

As you can see, more than 82% of all the money the federal government collects in revenue each year comes from the (unlawful) imposition of direct, non-apportioned taxes on the labor of all working men, women and children of America since the creation of the Federal Reserve System. Before 1913, no government revenue came from the direct taxation of American labor. Ask yourself this question: why should America's working class be forced to carry the major burden of taxation in this country, when multinational billion dollar corporations barely contribute a fraction? It is clear who works for whom.

Did you know that the largest expense that you will have in your life will be taxes? Your home, car, t.v., phone, and even your credit card will not compare to your tax bill over the course of your life. Even in death, you will be paying taxes to your benevolent governing power. Is this the America that our founders envisioned when they declared independence from the monetary oppression and taxation without representation of the Mother country?

As I have outlined above, our local, state, and federal governments are keeping two sets of books. The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) is the actual financial report by which you can assess your governments finances, but chances are that you've never heard of it. The budget is a meaningless report that only contains operational expenses, i.e., the assets required to meet those expenses, it does not list investment revenue and total income. Within the CAFR, which is a public document that can be viewed on the internet or your local library, is contained all of the various cash surpluses and investment revenues (stocks, bonds, etc.) that the general public is unaware of, which reach into the trillions. You will find that our governing bodies are running surpluses in the trillions, while reporting deficits to you in their so-called annual budgets. So explain to me why we are being taxed into oblivion? What happens to all of this excess money? There's only one reason for the oppressive tax system that Americans presently endure, and that is the Communist goal of egalitarianism (wealth redistribution) and class warfare, which is why the first two pillars of the Communist Manifesto are central banking and the income tax, to be used in tandem. Is it mere coincidence that the Federal Reserve Act and the fraudulent 16th Amendment (tax act) were passed in the the same year (1913)?

"2000-2005; Hmmm... 65% of our investments [state and local government investment funds that can be found in the CAFR] are now directly or indirectly held internationally and in most cases are valued in those foreign government's currencies and not the dollar. If we devalue the dollar, on the currency exchange rate we can make a killing! Let us push for those international imports which we now own through investment, create a trade deficit, keep interest rates very low to deter investment in the dollar, and if we can push the dollar index down from 105 to 75 on our international investments held outside of the dollar we will make 40% on the currency exchange rate and our return for our international investments will double or triple by so doing!" source

As you are coming to learn, everything is a racket run by thugs. The 85,000 local, state, and federal governments across the country have investment funds on the conservative side of 60 trillion dollars... that's trillion with a "T". That's enough to pay the national debt six times over and do away with taxes forever.

When did this all start? In 1945, when the CAFR system was put in place and the corporate charters of the U.N. came into effect here in the U.S., and our governments became corporate charters for foreign profit. They had planned to implement this system after WWI under the League of Nations, but it's failure paved the way for WWII and the new League of Nations renamed United Nations.

A documentary on the history and legality of the income tax.


In 1913, the so-called income tax Amendment (16th) was never legally ratified by three fourths of the States, and therefore is not the law of this land (see The Law That Never Was by Bill Benson). Although, it was adopted into the Constitution by an act of Congress, so those under the jurisdiction of the District of Columbia are subject to this Amendment. Either way, you can see the magnificent fraud being perpetrated upon the people of this nation.

"Unwittingly, America has returned to its pre-American Revolution, feudal roots whereby all land is held by a sovereign and the common people had no rights to hold allodial title to property. Once again, We the People are the tenants and sharecroppers renting our own property from a Sovereign in the guise of the Federal Reserve Bank. We the People have exchanged one master for another."-- Representative James Traficant
"Substance can only be determined by that which is left when all privileges are removed. If your ownership is determined by privilege, and not by Right, then there is no substance to the ownership, and if the county can move you out for the failure to pay your "property tax," then -- by definition -- your ownership is through the state’s privilege and not by the Rights detailed in the Declaration of Independence."-- David Gould

Be careful what you wish for. All of you who are dependent upon government for your daily living shall one day reap the reward of your foolishness. If you are dependent upon the meager subsistence of Social Security, Welfare, Medicare, government controlled utilities, grant money, loans, all forms of licensing, government/corporate controlled resources, etc., you shall reap what you sow. These privileges granted you by your benevolent government are given at a price, like all things given to another by another: your freedom and liberty. What government can give, government can take away. Until you realize and understand this simple point, you are hopelessly lost, and deserve your fool's paradise (prison). The public welfare can easily be taken care of by charity, as it was before we were fed the lie of huge government and her force-backed larcenies.

If you’re really free, then let your imaginations wonder and ask yourself - am I really in-charge of what I do or where I go? When you get to the bottom-line, aren’t you really a consumer advocate who is not only chained to the home, phone, car and things that supposedly provide pleasure, but also chasing the almighty dollar? Once and not all that long ago such possessions, creature comforts and unlimited credit were only for the rich, now they are everyone’s necessities. Ask yourself - doesn’t acquiring, holding and maintaining possessions and money dominate our thoughts and lives? If so, then aren’t we just paving the way of everlasting torment? Sometimes, we get tired of the chase and try to quit or escape, but quickly discover we can’t! If we try to stop or slip away the grindstone threatens to pulverize us into dust. We all know, without thinking what this giant stone feels like, but have you ever wondered what this burdensome stone looks like? Well, believe it or not it’s called fiat money. Don't get me wrong... I have nothing against money. In fact, it is representative of hard work and ingenuity, when it is real. It is the very stalwart of a free society with all of their property rights in tact, when it is backed by a tangible asset; but a fiat system designed to enslave through debt and fraud, such as the Federal Reserve System, is the most EVIL of all.

"There is something so consummately ridiculous in the idea of a nation's getting money by paying interest to itself upon its own stock, that the mind of every rational man naturally rejects it. It is, really, something little short of madness to suppose, that a nation can increase its wealth; increase its means of paying others; that it can do this by paying interest to itself. When time is taken to reflect, no rational man will attempt to maintain a proposition so shockingly absurd" (William Cobbett, M.P., Paper Against Gold, p.83).

Have you ever presented yourself before a traffic court? If so, have you ever wondered where that particular court garnered the authority to extort money from you? After all, how can the Government (a non-entity) bring suit against a living breathing human being? Who is the injured party in such a case as a traffic violation? The police officer? The State? Under Common Law (what the American justice system was originally founded upon), an injured party must bring suit against the other party, i.e., the injured party must present themselves in court dead or alive. If there is no injured party, then there is no case. Try to exercise your Constitutional rights in traffic court, and the judge will laugh at you, while hitting you with a fine. Why? Obviously, the Constitution of the U.S. or Common Law is not the law of traffic court or any other court in the U.S. There exists a shadow law within this country that is precipitating the wholesale corruption of our legal system under the fraudulent guise of Common Law.

The Judicial branch of our Government has been usurped by a private corporation known as the American Bar Association (a franchise of the Lawyer's Guild of Great Britain), a process that started in the 1920's. Once the international banksters controlled America's money with the passage of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, they proceeded to bankrupt America, a process that was completed from 1930 to 1933, and was laid out at the Geneva Conventions of 1930. Once the bankruptcy of our Government was completed, the reorganization of America in favor of her creditors was under way, part of which involved the establishment of admiralty-maritime commercial law, i.e., Uniform Commercial Code, as the new law of the land in order to legally recognize this bankruptcy against her collateralized debtors, heretofore known as "citizens" of the United States Corporation (14th Amendment). This is why the Government Corporation can levee fines against your person for the abuse of your "privileges" as a Corporate citizen, why the IRS can confiscate your property without due process of law, why you are held liable for more taxes than you can count, and why the Government can force you to carry a Social Security Number establishing your Corporate Straw Man identity (your name in all caps). In other words, we have been forced into debt slavery to the international banking cartel, through a virulent take over of our Government and legal system.

"With the Erie RR v. Thompkins case of 1938, the Supreme Court confirmed their success. We are now in an international private commercial jurisdiction in colorable admiralty-maritime under the Law Merchant. We have been conned and betrayed out of our sovereignty, rights, property, freedom, common law, Article III courts, and Republic. The Bill of Rights has been statutized into "civil rights" in commerce.

America has been stolen. We have been made slaves: permanent debtors, bankrupt, in legal incapacity, rendered "commercial persons", "residents", and corporate franchisees known as "citizens of the United States" under the so-called "14th Amendment". Said "Amendment" (which was never ratified - see Congressional Record, June 13, 1967; Dyett v. Turner, (1968) 439 P2d 266, 267; State v. Phillips, (1975) affirmed a citizenship ???."[2]

Our Founding Fathers warned of the dangers of allowing the banks and their corporations to take over our country and its government. Today we are serfs to the corporate banking cartels that control our government and write our laws. The Constitutional Republican form of government that our Fathers founded has been supplanted with a corporate fascist State in the model of every tyrannical dictatorship across history. The facts are undeniable: we have no property rights, our lives are regulated by a small minority centered in Washington D.C., Wall Street, and London, we have been in a state of martial law since the end of the Civil War, the income tax system is a fraud run by the bankster's Gestapo called the IRS, huge corporations are given more rights and power than all of the rest of us combined, each subsequent generation must work harder and harder paying for the sins of the previous generation, we are a bankrupt society without the ability to pay our debts, and free speech and freedom of the press are a farce as we are being systematically deceived by those that control us. Clearly an economic system predicated on the theft of the wealth of average Americans is not of sound fundamental footing. Such a system is designed for the benefit of the few over the many. We supposedly fought a war over the issue of whether some men had the right to the sweat and toil of others; it would appear the slave handlers won after all.

"A really efficient totalitarian state would be one in which the all powerful executive of political bosses and their army of managers control a population of slaves WHO DO NOT HAVE TO BE COERCED, because they love their servitude. To make them love it is the task assigned, in present day totalitarian states, to ministries of propaganda, newspaper editors and schoolteachers. [Brave New World, Bantam Books, 1967, p. xii. Caps added.]-- Aldous Huxley  

Ask yourself this question: am I a free sovereign individual living in a free republic of other free sovereign individuals governed by just laws and basic human rights, or am I a consumer/debtor within a corporate fiat money system, with advocacy privileges granted by an overzealous Government and her corporate handlers?

We owe it to our children that we shall not depart and leave them in a condition of bondage and slavery to organized greed and gold.".....      Congressman Lemke: "....This nation is bankrupt; every State in this Union is bankrupt; the people of the United States, as a whole, are bankrupt.  The public and private debts of this Nation, which are evidenced by bonds, mortgages, notes, or other written instruments about to about $250,000,000,000, and it is estimated that there is about $50,000,000,000 of which there is no record, making in all about $300,000,000,000 of public and private debts.  The total physical cash value of all the property in the United States is now estimated at about $70,000,000,000. That is more than it would bring if sold at public auction.   In this we do not include debts or the evidence of debts, such as bonds, mortgages, and so fourth.  These are not physical property.  They will have to be paid out of the physical property.  How are we going to pay $300,000,000,000 with only $70,000,000,000?" Congressional Record, March 3, 1934       Congressman McFadden: "In view of what the gentleman has just said,  recall that Theodore Roosevelt, the year that he passed on, made a statement to the effect that Felix Frankfurter is the most dangerous man in the United States to our form of government." Congressional Record, March 13, 1934      

 

This web site is a detailed exposé on the history of this country's fall from its original brilliance... at least on paper(Declaration of Independence,) for lack of it in practice.  And like Patrick Henry remarked about the Constitutional Convention: "I smell a rat!"

In 42 B.C., CICERO said, "A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and he carries his banners openly. But the traitor moves among those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their garments, and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared."

"When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves, in the course of time, a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it." -- Fred Bastiat - Around 1850

"In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist."-- D.D. Eisenhower

"For some time I have been disturbed by the way the CIA has been diverted from it's original assignment. It has become an operational and at times a policy making arm of the government." -- President Harry Truman

“The high office of the President has been used to foment a plot to destroy the American's freedom and before I leave office, I must inform the citizen of this plight."-- JFK at Columbia University, Nov. 12th 1963

JFK also had no love for the "military-industrial complex", and attempted to abolish the CIA. He was murdered on November 22, 1963.

"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened."-- Sir Winston Churchill

“Poor men want to be rich, rich men want to be king, and kings want to be god.”

Benjamin Franklin said, “When you run into debt, you give another power over your liberty.” And under the law of God as set forth by Proverbs 22:7:

"The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is SERVANT to the lender.” 

"I believe that if the people of this nation fully understood what Congress has done to them over the last 49 years, they would move on Washington; they would not wait for an election... It adds up to a preconceived plan to destroy the economic and social independence of the United States!"-- George W. Malone

 

The Making Of A Communist Dictatorship Edmund Burke 1729-1797 stated: "The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing." This is exactly what has happened and brought us to the sad situation today.

"Beware the leader who bangs the drums of war in order to whip the citizenry into a patriotic fervor, for patriotism is indeed a double-edged sword. It both emboldens the blood, just as it narrows the mind. And when the drums of war reached a fever pitch and the blood boils with hate and the mind has 'closed', the leader will have no need in seizing the rights of the citizenry. Rather, the citizenry, infused with fear and blinded by patriotism, will offer up all their rights unto the leader and gladly so. How do I know? For this is what I have done. AND I AM CAESAR." --Julius Caesar

"Why of course the people don't want war ... But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is (a democracy, or) a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship ...Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger."- Hermann Goering, at the Nuremberg Trials after World War II.

The power that a State has over its people resides in its war powers...  

I don't want to blame everything on FDR, after all, Wilson and the constructors of the Federal Reserve system certainly have to share part of the blame, but there is no distorting this fact:  FDR was the biggest traitor that this country has ever known.  Besides selling every living soul within the confines of this great nation into slavery, FDR is single handedly responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people across the globe(selling millions into human slavery in Eastern Europe), putting him in the same company with mass murderers, such as Hitler and Stalin.  His "New Deal", a.k.a. "Raw Deal", was almost word for word taken from the Communist Manifesto.  He was a card carrying Communist and he did his best to turn America into a Communist dictatorship-- no matter the means to an end. FDR went out of his way to help his buddy Stalin, including allowing him to build his navy in the U.S., and sending him supplies and weapons, not to mention the atomic bomb. Yes, FDR is the reason that the Soviets achieved a nuclear bomb, for which we spent 50 years on the brink of total annihilation. These are just a few of his treasonous acts.

Nothing annoys me more than when ignorant members of my community and the mass media refer to America as a Democracy.  America, as it was originally formed, was not a Democracy; to which our founding fathers were opposed, nor has it ever been, but was infact setup as a Constitutional Republic.  FDR effectively abolished this form of government and converted it into a dictatorship run by foreign banking interests.  While our troops were abroad, giving their lives for their country; they returned home to find that they were victims of the same tyranny that they had fought against.  They arrived home slaves!

A Republic, by definition, has two principle elements, First, it is controlled by Law, therefore it does not control Law. Second, it recognizes the private independent sovereign nature of each person (man or woman) of competent age and capacity, therefore a Republic must be representative in its nature.

A Republic recognizes Law is unchangeable, or at least that it can only be changed by a higher source than government.  In a Republic the concept of “collective sovereignty” cannot exist, except with recognition that the State or nation, as a body of sovereigns, can speak through one elected voice;  though that one voice can never lawfully interfere with the private rights of the individual sovereigns.

“A Constitutional Republic” is a government created and controlled, at least, by the Law of a Constitution.  The Constitution of the United States of America was, in Law, foundationally based on the Bible, the Magna Charta, and The Declaration of Independence.  Those documents recognize man’s sovereignty, the divine nature of man’s creation and man’s divine right to Life, Liberty, Property, and the pursuit of happiness.  The American "citizen" has lost his sovereignty, and all representation in government.

“The Constitution is swollen with dangerous doctrine; doctrine that will be taken advantage of by the Federalists, a faction of monarchy men, military men, aristocrats and drones whose noise, impudence and zeal exceeds all belief."-- Richard Henry Lee, letter to George Mason, 1 October 1787  This was the "rat" that Patrick was smelling.

"If one understands that socialism is not a share-the-wealth program, but is in reality a method to consolidate and control the wealth, then the seeming paradox of super-rich men promoting socialism becomes no paradox at all. Instead, it becomes logical, even the perfect tool of power-seeking megalomaniacs. Communism or more accurately, socialism, is not a movement of the downtrodden masses, but of the economic elite." Gary Allen, Author

So the Roosevelt administration asked the United States Congress to pass legislation which would force the American people to give up their gold in exchange for paper money. When the passing of the appropriate legislation was accomplished, the American people were forced to give up their gold for this new paper money called "greenbacks" or US Government Notes (contrast this with the Federal Reserve Notes which we now have). They had received .67 in paper money for an ounce of gold. This sounded fair in the very beginning, but, shortly thereafter, the government raised the price of gold to .00 an ounce. In short, the government (during the great depression) had robbed the American populace of over three billion dollars. Senator Carter Glass was asked his opinion on this new development. He replied, "President Roosevelt, I think that this is worse than anything that Ali Baba's forty thieves could ever have perpetrated."

Not to mention his wretched NRA(National Recovery Administration) which forced American farmers to burn their crops, shoot their cattle, throw out their milk; all of this in the midst of a "Great Depression", where millions of Americans were starving and homeless.

"If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy." James Madison

Death And Taxes

"all that Congress would need to do, hereafter, in seeking to take over to its control any one of the great number of subjects of public interest, jurisdiction of which the states have never parted with, and which are reserved to them by the Tenth Amendment, would be to enact a detailed measure of complete regulation of the subject and enforce it by a socalled tax upon departures from it. To give such magic to the word 'tax' would be to break down all constitutional limitation of the powers of Congress and completely wipe out the sovereignty of the states." (Suprem Court, "Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Co.") 

What is the second pillar of the "Communist Manifesto"?  The answer is:  the income tax.

We've all sung that familiar phrase from our national anthem:  "for the land of the free, and the home of the brave."  How free do you suppose a people are when forced at the point of a gun to pay tribute to their masters in Washington D.C.?  When the government steals a portion of your paycheck before you even see it, can it be called freedom?  What happened to the 4th amendment?  Did you know that the Federal income tax, as propagated by our government, is unconstitutional?  "What about the 16th amendment", you say?  This amendment is completely pointless, according to the Supreme Court.  It changes nothing.

“The value of fiat money can be inferred only from the values of the present and future goods and services it can command. And that, in turn, has largely rested on the quantity of fiat money created relative to demand. The early history of the post-Bretton Woods system of generalized fiat money was plagued, as we all remember, by excess money issuance and the resultant inflationary instability. Central bankers' success, however, in containing inflation during the past two decades raises hopes that fiat money can be managed in a responsible way. This has been the case in the United States, and the dollar, despite many challenges to its status, remains the principal international currency.” (Speech delivered by Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan at the opening of an American Numismatic Society Exhibition, Federal Reserve Bank of New York on January 16, 2002.)

Yeah, sure...  In order for the Fed to "contain inflation" (in a fiat money system inflation is a fact of life because the government is in the counterfeiting business), they must steal from us with the invisible tax of controlled inflation, and by directly taxing us and our children into oblivion (can you count the ways that you are taxed everyday?). This is the main reason that we have an income tax; the other reason involves egalitarian goals (control over the middle class).  The fact remains that the income tax exists to strengthen the control of the power elites over the people, and serves no other purpose. 

Today we are an economy teetering on the edge.  It is inevitable that one day, as is with all economies run by such a scam, we will go over the edge-- and the results will be far worse than the Fed created "Great Depression".

Do we need an income tax?  Many Americans are duped into believing that if it weren't for the income tax, then government services would cease; but this is false.   The fact is that our economy is run via a fiat money system, i.e., our currency is not backed by any tangible assets(gold or silver), thus the government can fabricate money literally out of thin air.  The only time that there is a shortage of money in the economy is when it is manufactured by the government.

The Reagan administration did a study in the 1980's on where our income taxes went, concluding that no taxes taken from American's income went to pay for any government programs or services.  Where did it go??  That's the trillion dollar question:   "... 100% of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the Federal Debt ... all individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services taxpayers expect from government".-- 1984 Grace Commission report submitted to President Ronald Reagan

"Should government refrain from regulation (taxation), the worthlessness of the money becomes apparent and the fraud can no longer be concealed." -- John Maynard Keynes, "Consequences of Peace."

Until the income tax was enacted with full force in the 1940's, the number one campaign issue in every election was:  "what are we going to do with this surplus?"  Interesting, isn't it??  Since the enactment of the illegal income tax, we are running deficits in the trillions.  To quote Patrick again, "I smell a rat!"

Many now believe, thanks to government run schooling and mass media, that it is only Patriotic to pay your "fair share" in taxes, but I can think of nothing more un-patriotic than continuing this fraud, and financing those that are destroying this country.  Don't get me wrong, pay your taxes, because if you don't the government will throw you in prison and steal all of your assets without a trial (land of the free?) but don't stand by and allow these injustices to occur without standing up and letting yourself be heard.  If the people will do nothing, then those that do not represent the people will do everything to the detriment of the people.  Let at least part of our national anthem ring true: "...and the home of the brave."     

assets(gold or silver), thus the government can fabricate money literally out of thin air.  The only time that there is a shortage of money in the economy is when it is manufactured by the government.

 

 

 

 

A Perversion Of Law Frederick Bastiat, an 18th century economist and philosopher, has written some of the premiere treatises on laissez faire capitalism, common law, government, and economics.  His works are a must read for anyone wishing to brush up on any of the aforementioned subjects.

“The Law" (his pamphlet written in 1848) is here presented again because the same situation exists in America today as in the France of 1848. The same socialist-communist ideas and plans that were then adopted in France are now sweeping America. The explanations and arguments then advanced against socialism by Mr. Bastiat are word for word equally valid today. His ideas deserve a serious hearing.

"It will be of little avail to the people that the laws are made by men of their own choice if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood."
James Madison

The Federal Reserve Fraud The following extract is from Sir Archibald Alison's "History of Europe":-
"The Prince of Orange(King of England and Ireland in 1689) brought from the Republic of Holland, where it had been already practised and thoroughly understood, the secret of governing popular assemblies and extracting heavy taxes from popular communities. . . . His whole efforts were directed to gain the majority of the constituencies by corruption, and of votes in Parliament by patronage. . . . It was then that the National Debt began; and government was taught the dangerous secret of providing for the necessities, and maintaining the influence, of present times by borrowing money and laying its payment on posterity."

 President Andrew Jackson stated in reference to the bankers at the state of his administration: "You are a den of vipers and thieves. I intend to rout you out, and by the Eternal God, I will rout you out." 

"These International bankers and Rockefeller-Standard Oil interests control the majority of newspapers and the columns of these papers to club into submission or drive out of public office officials who refuse to do the bidding of the powerful corrupt cliques which compose the invisible government." Theodore Roosevelt

On June 4, 1963, a virtually unknown Presidential decree, Executive Order 11110, was signed with the authority to basically strip the Federal Reserve Bank of its power to create from nothing and loan money to the United States Federal Government at interest. With the stroke of a pen, President Kennedy declared that the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank would soon be out of business. President Kennedy Nov. 12, 1963 said: "The high office of the President has been used to foment a plot to destroy the American's freedom and before I leave office, I must inform the citizen of this plight." On Nov. 22nd, he was assassinated.

The history of usury (the practice of charging interest for the use of money) goes back thousands of years, where it was outlawed across Europe.  It is the subject of William Shakespeare's "The Merchant of Venice", where a character by the name of Shylock bonds a certain merchant into signing away a piece of his own flesh.  In Shakespeare's day, the practice was considered evil; perhaps they were smarter than we are today.Central banking is not a new concept.  It goes back thousands of years, where it was often made illegal.  It was widely held in Europe to be far too dangerous a thing to put the full power of any nations currency in the hands of one party or individual.  He who controls the money controls all.  Certain kings made themselves very wealthy, while playing to the whims of a few private banks, to the detriment of their countrymen and all those that have followed.

The Federal Reserve System has plagued this country for years, repressing our economy and causing disaster after disaster.  Every major depression and panic in the history of this country can be traced to the irresponsible actions of the Fed and the government. 

For a detailed expose on the illegal and fraudulent actions of the Fed since its sinister beginning, you can read this speech by Congressmen Louis T. McFadden.Mr. Louis T. McFadden, ex-President of the Pennsylvania Bankers' Association, and for twelve years Chairman of the U.S.A. House of Representatives' Banking and Currency Committee, speaking in the U.S.A. Congress on December 15, 1931, said, in referring to the economic slump: "It was not accidental. It was a carefully contrived occurrence - the International Bankers sought to bring about a condition of despair here so that they could emerge as rulers of us all."

Obviously, a group that could completely excise these matters from political discourse in the United States, without complaint by any significant part of the public, must be powerful indeed. Now, how the apologists for the Federal Reserve System have been successful since 1913 in stifling political debate on money and banking the history books do not satisfactorily explain. What is clear enough, nonetheless, is that the FRS was established to remove the Constitution as the arbiter of national monetary policy on behalf of all Americans, and to guarantee instead that certain special-interest groups are disproportionately (indeed, monopolistically) represented in the determination of that policy, for the peculiar benefit of those groups and at everyone else's expense. 

 The year 1924 will always be remembered by students of economic history as the year in which Reginald McKenna "blew the gaff" on the banking system in his now-famous admission to the shareholders of the Midland Bank, in January, 1924; "I am afraid the ordinary citizen will not like to be told that the banks can, and do create money. The amount of money in existence varies only with the action of the banks in increasing and decreasing deposits and bank purchases. Every loan, overdraft or bank purchase creates a deposit, and every repayment of a loan, overdraft, or bank sale destroys a deposit. AND THEY WHO CONTROL THE CREDIT OF A NATION, DIRECT THE POLICY OF GOVERNMENTS, AND HOLD IN THE HOLLOW OF THEIR HANDS THE DESTINY OF THE PEOPLE."

Truth is most people don't realise that the issuing of money is essentially a private business, and that the privilege of issuing money has been a major bone of contention throughout history.

Wars have been fought and depressions have been caused in the battle over who issues the money; however the majority of us are not aware of this, and this is largely due to the fact that the winning side became and increasingly continues to be a vital and respected member of our global society, having an influence over large aspects of our lives including our education, our media and our governments.

While we might feel powerless in trying to stop the manipulation of money for private profit at our expense, it is easy to forget that we collectively give money it's value. We have been taught to believe printed pieces of paper have special value, and because we know others believe this too, we are willing to work all our lives to get what we are convinced others will want.Most are completely unaware of the fact that the Federal Reserve consists of twelve privately owned corporations, and in reality has nothing to do with the Federal Government, except that it controls it.  They use terms like "Federal Reserve" and "Bank of England" in order to mask this simple fact. 

An honest look at history will show us how our innocent trust has been misused.For an excellent book detailing the misuse of monetary policy in this country go here:  The Panic of 1819 by Murray N. Ruthbard Don't know why banking is such a big scam??  Then read this article and you will understand.  "The financial system has been turned over to... the federal reserve board. That board administers the finance system by authority of... a purely profiteering group. The system is private, conducted for the sole purpose of obtaining the greatest possible profits from the use of other peoples money." Rep Charles A, Lindbergh (R-MN)

"This act establishes the most gigantic trust on earth. When the President signs this bill, the invisible government by the Monetary Power will be legalised.

The people may not know it immediately, but the day of reckoning is only a few years removed... The worst legislative crime of the ages is perpetrated by this banking bill."
Rep. Charles Lindbergh (R-MN)
"We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled governments in the civilised world - no longer a government of free opinion, no longer a government by... a vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.

Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organised, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it."
Woodrow Wilson

"To cause high prices all the Federal Reserve board will do will be to lower the re-discount rate..., producing an expansion of credit and a rising stock market; then when... business men are adjusted to these conditions, it can check... prosperity in mid-career by arbitrarily raising the rate of interest.

It can cause the pendulum of a rising and falling market to swing gently back and forth by slight changes in the discount rate, or cause violent fluctuations by greater rate variation, and in either case it will possess inside information as to financial conditions and advance knowledge of the coming change, either up or down.

This is the strangest, most dangerous advantage ever placed in the hands of a special privilege class by any Government that ever existed.

The system is private, conducted for the sole purpose of obtaining the greatest possible profits from the use of other people's money.

They know in advance when to create panics to their advantage. They also know when to stop panic. Inflation and deflation work equally well for them when they control finance..." Rep. Charles Lindbergh (R-MN)

"To repeal the Act creating bank notes, or to restore to circulation the government issue of money will be to provide the people with money and will therefore seriously affect our individual profits as bankers and lenders. See your congressman at once and engage him to support our interest that we may control legislation." James Buel American Bankers Association 

 "On Sept 1st, 1894, we will not renew our loans under any consideration. On Sept 1st we will demand our money. We will foreclose and become mortgagees in possession. We can take two-thirds of the farms west of the Mississippi, and thousands of them east of the Mississippi as well, at our own price... Then the farmers will become tenants as in England..." 1891 American Bankers Association as printed in the Congressional Record of April 29, 1913.  Bankers love wars and depressions.

 

 

 

 

A History Of Money

If one were to study the history of money, they shouldn't be astonished to realize that money and war go hand in hand; after all, you can't wage war without the weaponry and the paid soldiers to wage it with. Every major conflict over the past thousand years has been directly linked to the manipulation of coin, paper money, and credit. From the Crusades to WWII, you will find that the real manipulators of war are the financiers. To quote the movie All The Presidents Men: "follow the money."
14th Amendment Radicalism The 14th Amendment is used by more radical communist groups (ACLU) as justification for their extreme worldviews, than any other section of our Constitution. What is the history of this Amendment? What are its ramifications? You will be surprised to find out that this is the Amendment that establishes slavery in this country by establishing a new form of citizenship. It was originally created just after the Civil War under the pretense of protecting the newly freed slaves, but its true function established a new form of slave-citizen of the federal government. It should more appropriately be called the “Red Amendment”.

 

 

 

Send Me An Email | Site Map | ©2007 Give Me Liberty Vote for me in July 29, 2007

Google
 
Web Search This Site